Resolving similar entities from a database.

专利摘要:

公开号:NL2012438A
申请号:NL2012438
申请日:2014-03-14
公开日:2014-09-16
发明作者:Daniel Erenrich
申请人:Palantir Technologies Inc；
IPC主号:

专利说明:

Resolving similar entities from a database
Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to data analysis and, more specifically, to resolving similar entities from a database.
Description of the Related Art
Obtaining relevant information from large databases can be relatively straightforward in some situations. Particularly, when the data records in a database are well-structured and it is desired to obtain information in records having a particular value or character string in a particular field, those records can be isolated using filtering functions of database interfacing software. Using combinations of filtering functions, more sophistication can be provided to the way in which records are identified for isolation. The isolated records may then be aggregated so as to provide a report including all the records that together constitute the desired information.
However, in order to denote database records having commonality, such filtering functions rely on identical attributes across those database records. In the real world, database records may not have identical attributes across those records despite those records being related, or may have identical attributes in a relatively small number of fields (or parts of fields) such that filtering functions are unable to provide isolation of the desired database records from other database records. For example, such problems can occur when a database has database records originating from a number of different sources. The isolation of related database records from other database records is a technical problem that becomes worse as the database becomes larger (e.g., a database having billions of database records), in terms of the number of records present. With the sizes of databases in the real world increasing as time progresses, this problem is expected to worsen over time.
Embodiments of the invention address the problem of identifying related database records that may have not have useful identical attributes whilst excluding unrelated database records, and in particular solve the problem of identifying database records that relate to a common entity but which may have no identical attributes.
A first aspect of the invention provides a method for identifying related records from a database storing records for multiple entities as claimed in claim 1.
A second aspect of the invention provides a computer system as claimed in claim 12.
Optional features are listed in the dependent claims or are recited in the detailed description embodiments.
One advantage of the disclosed technique is that two record sets in a database of records that have no identical attributes, but belong to the same common entity, may be linked to the common entity. Therefore, resolutions that would be missed with string comparisons alone are made and incorrect resolutions based only on similar strings are avoided, which improves the resolution precision. Another advantage of the disclosed technique is that it reduces the number of mistaken aggregates resulting from records having similar identifiers despite being associated with different entities. By reducing the number of mistaken aggregates, an aggregated report of record sets thus provided occupies less memory than a corresponding aggregated report produced by filtering functions.
Brief Description of the Drawings
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
Figure 1 is a block diagram illustrating a computer system configured to implement one or more aspects of the present invention.
Figure 2 is a block diagram of the flow of data in through the application server.
Figure 3 illustrates a method for training the classifier, according to one embodiment.
Figure 4 illustrates a method of resolving merchant ID to a merchant, according to one embodiment.
Figure 5 illustrates an example of a computing environment, according to one embodiment.
Detailed Description
Embodiments of the invention may be used to aggregate certain records that are resolved to a common entity, but might not otherwise be grouped with one another. Assuming a database identifies records from each distinct account of an entity by a distinct ID attribute, then the distinct ID attributes may not be matched correctly to link the records of the accounts with the entity.. In one embodiment, a system combines records into ID sets based upon identical IDs, so each ID set contains all of the records with a particular ID.
As this example illustrates, a single entity may be represented by multiple IDs. To evaluate the full set of records for a single entity each collection of records (the ID sets) associated with the single entity need to be merged together .
For example, embodiments of the invention may be used to aggregate certain financial transaction records that are resolved to a common entity, but might not otherwise be grouped with one another. Assuming a transaction database of a financial institution identifies transaction records from each distinct merchant account of a company by a distinct merchant ID attribute, then the distinct merchant IDs attributes may not be matched correctly to link the transaction records of the accounts with the company. As another example, different franchisees of common franchisor will have spate merchant accounts, making it difficult to aggregate the transaction records associated with all franchisees of the franchisor from the transaction records alone. In one embodiment, a financial analysis system combines transaction records into merchant ID sets based upon identical merchant IDs, so each merchant ID set contains all of the transaction records with a particular merchant ID. As this example illustrates, a single company may be represented by multiple merchant IDs. To evaluate the full set of transaction records for a single entity (company) each collection of financial transaction records (the merchant ID sets) associated with the single entity need to be merged together .
Background art for handling transaction records will now be described.
Financial institutions store transactional data for analysis. A financial institution generates transactional data from credit and debit card purchases at companies that have a merchant account with the financial institution. The merchant account may be used to processes individual credit or debit card purchases. In turn, each such purchase is stored as a transaction record in a transaction database. A transaction record associated with a particular merchant account oftentimes includes a merchant ID attribute that links the transaction record to the merchant account. A merchant ID may be any data type, including a number, a string, or some combination thereof. The financial institution may then analyze the transaction records from one or more merchant accounts. For example, an analysis may involve aggregating the transaction records of a merchant account or particular merchant accounts. The analysis may then compare the performance of the merchant account to that of competing merchant accounts in the same geographic area.
Although the financial institution stores the transaction records in a database of transactions, certain analysis may require the data to be organized in ways that are not part of the transaction records in the database. These databases contain sets of transaction records that an analysis should group together, even though there is no single attribute value that relates the transaction records. For example, if a financial institution configures a database of transactions with a merchant ID attribute that links each transaction record to a merchant account, then an analysis would easily aggregate transaction records with the same merchant ID together. However, a single company may have multiple merchant accounts with a financial institution. If the financial institution provides distinct merchant IDs for every merchant account, even when multiple merchant accounts belong to a single company, then it is difficult to aggregate transaction records together from the multiple merchant accounts of that company. For instance, a franchise company may have distinct merchant accounts with distinct merchant IDs for each franchisee location. In such a case, an analysis could not aggregate the transaction records of the franchise company together based on identical merchant IDs alone.
Instead, an analysis can use similarities between the merchant ID attribute values to aggregate the transaction records of the franchise company together.
Existing techniques rely upon simple tests, such as string comparisons between an attribute in a database of transaction records to detect similarities between groups of transaction records. Transaction records including attribute strings that meet a measure of similarity are then aggregated together for analysis. These techniques may work as long as the attribute contains strings that are identical or similar for groups of transaction records that should be aggregated together and strings that are distinct for groups of transaction records that should not be aggregated together.
However, such identifiers are not always (or even usually) available. For example, different merchant IDs for the merchant accounts of a single company may prevent an analysis system from aggregating the transaction records of the company together. Furthermore, transaction records may contain similar identifiers that an analysis system may base aggregations upon, even if the transaction records should not be aggregated together. For example, two different companies may have merchant accounts with similar merchant IDs, which an analysis system could mistakenly match to one company. The analysis system may then mistakenly aggregate the transaction records of the two companies together.
As the foregoing illustrates, there remains a need for more effective techniques evaluating financial transaction records .
In one embodiment, the analysis system aggregates transaction records from a large collection of merchant ID sets. This aggregation may include calculating the average transaction size, the transaction size standard deviation, or the average amount that an individual has spent. The analysis system uses the aggregates to train a classifier. Once trained, the analysis system produces a confidence score of whether two merchant ID sets belong to a company, based upon the aggregates from the pair of merchant ID sets. To associate the merchant ID sets to the company, the analysis system receives a selection of an exemplar merchant ID set that should be associated with the company and best represents the characteristics of the company. The analysis system compares the exemplar merchant ID set with other merchant ID sets to determine a confidence score. The confidence score represents the likelihood that the exemplary merchant ID set and the other merchant ID set is associated with the company. The analysis system associates every merchant ID set having a confidence scores above a threshold, when compared with the exemplar, to the company. Doing so results in a collection of financial transaction records that presumably all belong to one company, despite the fact that many of such records may include different merchant IDs.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a more thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent that the present invention may be practiced without one or more of these specific details.
Figure 1 is a block diagram illustrating an example data analysis system 100, according to one embodiment of the present invention. As shown, the data analysis system 100 includes an application server 140 running on a server computing system 130, a client 120 running on a client computer system 110, and at least one transaction database 160. Further, the client 120, application server 140, and transaction database 160 may communicate over a network 180.
The client 120 represents one or more software applications configured to present data and translate user inputs into requests for data analyses by the application server 140. In this embodiment, the client 120 connects to the application server 140. However, several clients 120 may execute on the client computer 110 or several clients 120 on several client computers 110 may interact with the application server 140. In one embodiment, the client 120 may be a browser accessing a web service.
Alternatively, the client 120 may run on the same server computing system 130 as the application server 140. In any event, a user would interact with the data analysis system 100 through the client 120.
The application server 140 is configured to include a merchant resolution tool 150 and an analysis engine 155. The merchant resolution tool 150 links matching merchant IDs to a company. The merchant resolution tool 150 reads data from the transaction database 160. The merchant resolution tool 150 may store resolution data on the server computer 130 or on the transaction database 160.
The analysis engine 155 uses the resolution data from the merchant resolution tool 150 to analyze data retrieved from the transaction database 160. The analysis engine 155 aggregates and compares the transaction records from the transaction database 160 to provide insights about a particular company. For instance, a financial institution may design a data analysis to evaluate the seasonal spending trends for a franchise company. However, each franchisee of the franchise company may have a distinct merchant account with the financial institution. The financial institution stores the transaction records from the merchant accounts with distinct merchant IDs that associate a transaction record with a merchant account. To evaluate the full set of transaction records for the franchise company the analysis engine 155 needs to merge each collection of financial transaction records from each franchisee together. Therefore, the analysis engine 155 uses the resolution data from the merchant resolution tool 150 to merge the financial transaction records from each franchisee together into a full set of transaction records for the franchise company in order to evaluate the seasonal spending trends for the franchise company.
In this embodiment, the transaction database 160 stores data records of financial transactions associated with a financial institution. For example, the transaction database may include data records for a large number of merchant accounts processing credit and debit card transaction. In such a case, each record would include data attributes for the amount spent, the transaction date and time, the address of the merchant, and a merchant ID to associate the record with a particular merchant account.
The transaction database 160 may be a Relational Database Management System (RDBMS) that stores the transaction data as rows in relational tables. Alternatively, the transaction database 160 may be stored on the same server computing system 130 as the application server 140. The data records of a financial institution.
Figure 2 illustrates a flow of data from the transaction database 160 through the merchant resolution tool 150, according to one embodiment of the present invention. As shown, the transaction database 160 includes merchant ID sets 210. Each merchant ID set 210 includes transaction records 215 with the same merchant ID, such as credit and debit card transactions processed for a single merchant account at a financial institution. The merchant resolution tool 150 includes an aggregator 240, candidate aggregates 242, exemplar aggregates 244, training data set 260, and an identity resolver 250. The identify resolver 250 itself includes a classifier 255 and a resolve list 270.
In one embodiment, the classifier 255 is a random forest classifier. A random forest classifier is a machine learning algorithm that is generally known to be highly accurate on large databases that include discrete, continuous, and missing data, as may be the case for financial transaction records 215 in the transaction database 160. Random forest classifiers include multiple decision trees. The decision trees evaluate features of input data. In the present context, of financial transaction records that are associated with merchant accounts by a merchant id, the evaluated features may include:
• Word overlap count and frequency of merchant ID
attributes • Word-based cosine similarity weighted by per-term inverse document frequency scores of merchant ID attributes
• Character-based cosine similarity of merchant ID
attributes
• Placement of word overlap of merchant ID
attributes • Identification of the string ".com" • If the merchant ID attributes includes a store code • Overlap of prefix or suffix digits in the merchant ID attributes • Whether the provided city is numeric • Matching unique merchant category codes • Fractional difference in average ticket amounts • Standard deviations from the average ticket amounts • Fractional difference in magnitude of the ticket amount variances
Note, the classifier 255 may evaluate a variety of other features, depending on the needs of a particular case and data available from the underlying transaction records. Further one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that a random forest classifier is used as a reference example of a classifier and that a variety of other machine learning classifiers could be used.
To evaluate the variety of features the classifier 255 grows decision trees based upon the probability that a selected feature should lead to a certain classification. In the present context, the classifier 255 grows several decision trees based upon different combinations of the features, so that each decision tree classifies a pair of merchant ID sets 210 as matching the same company or not. The output of the classifier 255 is the percentage of decision trees that classify a pair of merchant ID sets 210 as matching the same company.
To prepare for linking merchant IDs to a company, the classifier 255 grows the decision trees by training on the training data set 260. The training data set 260 includes pairs of merchant ID sets 210 that match the same company and pairs of merchant ID sets 210 that do not match the same company. The pairs of merchant ID sets 210 that match the same company are classified as positive examples in the training data set 260. The pairs of merchant ID sets 210 that do not match the same company are classified as negative examples in the training data set 260. As the classifier 255 processes the features of each pair of merchant ID sets 210 as a positive or negative example, the classifier 255 becomes more accurate by refining the probabilities used in the decision trees.
The training data set 260 may also include difficult edge cases, such as pairs of merchant ID sets 210 that do not match, but have similar merchant ID strings. A pair of merchant ID sets 210 with similar merchant ID strings that should not be linked to the same company is an edge case, because oftentimes similar merchant ID strings come from merchant ID sets 210 that should be linked to the same company. Adding such edge cases to the training data set 260 causes the classifier 255 to adjust the probabilities in the decision trees of the classifier 255 to better classify pairs of merchant ID sets 210 with similar merchant ID attributes.
To create a large training data set 260, the merchant resolution tool 150 may generate pairs of randomly selected merchant ID sets 210, which typically provide negative training examples.
The training data set 260 may include transaction records 215 retrieved from the transaction database 160, may include synthetic transaction records 215, or may include some combination thereof. While a training data set 260 of 4,000 pairs of merchant ID sets 210 has proven to be effective, the actual size of the training data set 260 may be set as a matter of preference.
Once the classifier 255 is trained, the merchant resolution tool 150 may be used to associate merchant IDs from distinct merchant account to a company, so that the analysis engine 155 may run data analyses on full sets of transaction records 215 from all merchant accounts of the company.
The transaction database 160 is configured to include a mechanism for providing transaction records 215 with a common merchant ID attribute as merchant ID sets 210. For example, the transaction database 160 may store transaction records 215 with equal merchant ID attributes together in merchant ID sets 210 or the transaction database 160 may store transaction records 215 sequentially by the value of a transaction date attribute. Regardless of the arrangement of the transaction records 215, the merchant resolution tool 150 may retrieve merchant ID sets 210 from the transaction database 160.
After a user selects a merchant ID set 210 as an exemplar merchant ID set 210(0), other merchant ID sets 210 may be considered as candidate merchant ID sets 210(1) through 210(M-l). The user selects the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) as being representative of the characteristics of the company to be resolved. The exemplar merchant ID set may include a large number of transaction records 215. A large number of transaction records 215 may provide aggregates, such as the average transaction size, that are more accurate than merchant ID sets 210 with fewer transaction records 215.
Other factors, such as geographic locations, the merchant ID string, or other business heuristics may also guide the selection of the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) from the available merchant ID sets 210.
When linking merchant IDs to a company, the merchant resolution tool 150 retrieves the transaction records 215 of the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) and the transaction records 215 of a candidate merchant ID set 210(1). The aggregator 240 aggregates the attributes of the transaction records 215 of the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) to produce exemplar aggregates 244. For example, the aggregator 240 calculates the average transaction size, the transaction size standard deviation, or the average amount that an individual has spent. The merchant ID attribute of the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) is also included with the exemplar aggregates 244. The aggregator 240 also calculates the candidate aggregates 242 from the candidate merchant ID set 210 and includes the merchant ID attribute of the candidate merchant ID set 210(1) with the candidate aggregates 242. Note that the aggregator 240 may calculate additional aggregate values, according to numerous different designs that the tool developer can choose.
After the aggregator 240 determines the aggregate values, the merchant resolution tool 150 passes the exemplar aggregate 244 and the candidate aggregate 242 to an identity resolver 250. The classifier 255 determines the values used as features in the decision trees from the data included in the exemplar aggregates 244 and the candidate aggregates 242. The classifier 255 processes the exemplar aggregate 244 and the candidate aggregate 242 to produce a confidence score between zero and one equal to how likely the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) matches the candidate merchant ID set 210(1) and should therefore be linked to the same company. If the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) and the candidate merchant ID set 201(1) receive a score over some threshold, such as 0.70, then the identity resolver 250 stores the merchant ID of the candidate merchant ID set 201(1) in a resolve list 270.
The merchant resolution tool 150 compares candidate merchant ID sets 210(2) through 210(M-l) with the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0). The identity resolver 250 adds the merchant ID of each candidate merchant ID set 210(1) through 210(M-l) that produces a high confidence score to the resolve list 270. Therefore, the merchant IDs on the resolve list 270 represent the merchant ID sets 210 that belong to the same company as the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0).
The merchant resolution tool 150 stores the resolve list 270 for use by the analysis engine 155. In turn, the analysis engine 155 may analyze the full collection of transaction records 215 of the company independent of the various merchant IDs included in the transaction records 215 of the company. For example, if the various merchant IDs in a resolve list 270 associate transaction records 215 with multiple merchant accounts from multiple franchisees of a franchise company. Then the analysis engine 155 should merge the transaction records 215 with the merchant IDs in the resolve list 270 to analyze the full collection of transaction records 215 of the franchise company.
Figure 3 is a flow diagram of method steps for training the classifier 255, according to one embodiment of the present invention. Although the method steps are described in conjunction with the systems of Figures 1-2 and 5, persons of ordinary skill in the art will understand that any system configuration to perform the method steps, in any order, is within the scope of the invention.
As shown, method 300 beings at step 305, where a merchant resolution tool 150 creates a training data set 260 of positive examples of pairs of merchant ID sets 210 that link to the same company. The merchant resolution tool 150 adds edge cases to the training data set 210. The edge cases include pairs of merchant ID sets 210 that do not match, but have similar merchant ID strings. The edge cases may also include pairs of merchant ID sets 210 that have similar aggregate values, but are from different companies, so are actually negative training examples.
In step 310, the merchant resolution tool 150 adds randomly selected pairs of merchant ID sets 210 to the training data set 260. The randomly selected pairs of merchant ID sets 210 should include a majority of negative training examples.
In step 315, the merchant resolution tool 150 submits each merchant ID sets 210 in the training data set 260 to the aggregator 240 to generate candidate aggregates 242. When training the classifier 255, there is no exemplar merchant ID set 210(0), so all merchant ID sets 210 in the training data set 260 are considered candidates merchant ID sets 210(1) through 210(M-l). A user may review these candidate aggregates 242.
In step 320, the user selects pairs of merchant ID sets 210 that should be linked to the same company as positive training examples.
In step 325, the user selects pairs of merchant ID sets 210 that link to different companies as negative training examples. These negative training examples include several difficult edge cases. Additionally, the training data set 210 includes a majority of random selections, so the majority of the pairs of merchant ID sets 210 in the training data set 260 are negative training examples.
In step 330, the merchant resolution tool 150 trains the classifier 255 with the training data set 260. As described, the classifier 255 is a random forest learning algorithm.
After training the classifier 255 with the training data set 260, the classifier 255 may evaluate a pair of merchant ID sets 210 to produce a confidence score, e.g., a value between zero and one. The confidence score equals the percent of decision trees in the random forest algorithm used by the classifier 255 that determine that both merchant ID sets 210 in the pair should be linked to the same company. Therefore, the classifier 255 is able to produce a confidence score that represents whether a pair of merchant ID sets 210 including an exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) and a candidate merchant ID set 210(1) should be linked to the same company.
Figure 4 is a flow diagram of method steps for linking merchant IDs to a company according to one embodiment of the present invention. Although the method steps are described in conjunction with the systems of Figures 1-2 and 5, persons of ordinary skill in the art will understand that any system configuration to perform the method steps, in any order, is within the scope of the invention.
As shown, method 400 beings at step 410, where the merchant resolution tool 150 receives an exemplar merchant ID as the merchant ID attribute for an exemplar merchant ID set 210(0). As described, a user selects the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) as being representative of the characteristics of the financial transaction records 215 associated with a company, e.g., the franchisee that best represents a given franchise company. Alternatively, the system may automatically choose an exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) based on user-specified criteria.
In one embodiment, the merchant resolution tool 150 presents an exemplar selection tool to the user. The exemplar selection tool provides assistance in selecting an exemplar merchant ID that is representative of a company to be resolved. The exemplar selection tool may accept a search string from the user to identify merchant IDs that should potentially be linked to the company. The exemplar selection tool may also use some subset of the company name as the search string. Furthermore, the exemplar selection tool may submit the merchant ID sets 210 associated with the identified merchant IDs to the aggregator 240. The aggregator 240 then computes aggregates 242 that assist the user in selecting the exemplar merchant ID.
In step 420, the merchant resolution tool 150 generates exemplar aggregates 244 for the selected exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) . After the merchant resolution tool 150 retrieves the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) from the transaction database 160, the aggregator 240 calculates the average transaction size, the transaction size standard deviation, and the average amount that an individual has spent.
In step 430, the merchant resolution tool 150 generates candidate aggregates 242 for a candidate merchant ID set 210(1). The merchant resolution tool 150 identifies a merchant ID set 210(1) through 210(M-l) that has not been compared to the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0), as the candidate merchant ID set 210(1). Once identified, the merchant resolution tool 150 retrieves the candidate merchant ID set 210(1) from the transaction database 160, and submits the candidate merchant ID set 210(1) to the aggregator 240.
The aggregator 240 generates the candidate aggregates 242.
The aggregation and comparison of every possible merchant ID record set 210(1) through 210(M-l) may be very time consuming, so reducing the number of comparisons is desirable. In one embodiment, the merchant resolution tool 242 does not compare every merchant ID record set 210. The merchant resolution tool 242 skips merchant ID record sets 210 that do not meet a certain qualification. Assuming a franchise company only has franchisee locations in the state of California and the transaction records 215 include an attribute for the address at which the transaction occurred, then the merchant resolution tool 242 would skip those merchant ID record sets 210 that do not include transaction records 215 from California. In this case, the merchant resolution tool 242 reduces the number of comparisons by skipping those merchant ID sets 210 that are not from California .
In step 440, the merchant resolution tool 150 determines if the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) and the candidate merchant ID set 210(1) match one another and therefore should be linked to the same company. The identity resolver 250 submits the exemplar aggregates 244 and the candidate aggregates 242 to the classifier 255. As described, the classifier 255 produces a confidence score between zero and one equal to the percent of decision trees in the random forest algorithm used by the classifier 255 that determine that both merchant ID sets 210 in the pair should be linked to the same company. If the classifier 255 produces a confidence score under a threshold, then the method 400 proceeds to step 460. If, however, the confidence score is over the threshold, then method 400 proceeds to step 450. While a threshold confidence score of 0.70 has proven to be effective, the actual threshold may be set as a matter of preference.
In step 450, the identity resolver 250 stores the merchant ID attribute of the candidate merchant ID set 201(1) in a resolve list 270.
In one embodiment, the merchant resolution tool 242 merges the exemplar merchant ID set 240(0) and the candidate merchant ID set 240(1) into a combined merchant ID set, which becomes a new larger exemplar merchant ID set 240(0). Then the merchant resolution tool 242 re-generates the exemplar aggregates 244 for the remaining comparisons. In doing so, the new exemplar merchant ID set 240(0) may better represent the company and improve the resolution of the remaining candidate merchant ID sets 240(2) through 240(M-l).
In step 460, the merchant resolution tool 150 determines if there are more merchant ID sets 210 in the transaction database 160 that have not been compared. If the merchant resolution tool 150 determines there is another candidate merchant ID set 210(2) to compare, then the method 400 returns to step 430. Once no more candidate merchant ID sets 210 remain to compare, the merchant resolution tool 150 links merchant ID sets 210 listed in the resolve list 270 for the company.
In step 470, the merchant resolution tool 150 links the exemplar merchant ID set 210(0) with the candidate merchant ID sets 210(1) through 210(M-l) listed in the resolve list 270. As described, the resolution of the merchant ID sets may involve storing a list of merchant ID attributes that the analysis engine 155 can use to identify the transaction records 215 of the company. Alternatively, the merchant resolution tool 150 may link the transaction records 215 of the merchant ID sets 210 on the resolve list 270 to the company by populating an attribute of the transaction records 215 with the company name, so that the analysis engine 155 can query the transaction database 160 for the transaction records 215 belonging to the company.
Figure 5 illustrates an example server computing system 130 running a merchant resolution tool 150, according to one embodiment. As shown, the server computing system 130 includes, a central processing unit (CPU) 550, a network interface 570, a memory 520, and a storage 530, each connected to an interconnect (bus) 540. The server computing system 130 may also include an I/O device interface 560 connecting I/O devices 580 (e.g., keyboard, display and mouse devices) to the computing system 130. Further, in context of this disclosure, the computing elements shown in server computing system 130 may correspond to a physical computing system (e.g., a system in a data centre) or may be a virtual computing instance executing within a computing cloud.
The CPU 550 retrieves and executes programming instructions stored in memory 520 as well as stores and retrieves application data residing in memory 520. The bus 540 is used to transmit programming instructions and application data between the CPU 550, I/O device interface 560, storage 530, network interface 570, and memory 520. Note that the CPU 550 is included to be representative of a single CPU, multiple CPUs, a single CPU having multiple processing cores, a CPU with an associate memory management unit, and the like. The memory 520 is generally included to be representative of a random access memory. The storage530 may be a disk drive storage device. Although shown as a single unit, the storage 530 may be a combination of fixed and/or removable storage devices, such as fixed disc drives, removable memory cards, or optical storage, network attached storage (NAS), or a storage area-network (SAN).
The communications between the client 120 and the merchant resolution tool 150 are transmitted over the network 180 via the network interface 570.
Illustratively, the memory 520 includes a merchant resolution tool 150, exemplar aggregates 244, candidate aggregates 242, and a resolve list 270. The merchant resolution tool 150 itself includes an aggregator 240 and a classifier 225. The storage 530 includes a training data set 533, which the merchant resolution tool 150 uses to train the classifier 225.
The aggregator 240 generates the exemplar aggregates 244 and the candidate aggregates 242 from transaction records 215 retrieved from the transaction database 160. The merchant resolution tool 150 issues database queries over the network 180 to the transaction database 160 via the network interface 570. Once the aggregator 240 generates the exemplar aggregates 244 and candidate aggregates 242, the merchant resolution tool 150 uses the classifier 225 to determine if the merchant IDs sets 240 should be linked to a company.
Although shown in memory 520, the merchant resolution tool 150, exemplar aggregates 244, candidate aggregates 242, and resolve list 270, may be stored in memory 520, storage 530, or split between memory 520 and storage 530. Likewise, the training data set 533 may be stored in memory 520, storage 530, or split between memory 520 and storage 530.
In some embodiments, the database repository 160 may be located in the storage 530. In such a case, the database queries and subsequent responses are transmitted over the bus 540. As described, the client 120 may also be located on the server computing system 130, in which case the client 120 would also be stored in memory 520 and the user would utilize the I/O devices 580 to interact with the client 120 through the I/O device interface 560.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof. For example, aspects of the present invention may be implemented in hardware or software or in a combination of hardware and software. One embodiment of the invention may be implemented as a program product for use with a computer system. The program(s) of the program product define functions of the embodiments (including the methods described herein) and can be contained on a variety of computer-readable storage media. Examples of computer-readable storage media include (i) non-writable storage media (e.g., read-only memory devices within a computer, CD-ROM disks readable by a CD-ROM drive, flash memory, ROM chips or any type of solid-state nonvolatile semiconductor memory); and (ii) writable storage media (e.g., floppy disks within a diskette drive or hard-disk drive or any type of solid-state random-access semiconductor memory) on which alterable information is stored.
The invention has been described above with reference to specific embodiments. It will be understood however, that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The foregoing description and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Therefore, the scope of the present invention is determined by the claims that follow.

权利要求:
Claims (20)
[1]
A method for identifying related data cards from a database in which data cards are stored for multiple entities, the method comprising: retrieving a plurality of data sets, each data set comprising one or more of the data cards having a common attribute value; receiving a selection from or selecting an instance data set, the instance data set comprising a plurality of the data cards associated with a first entity; for each of the plurality of data card sets: determining a probability that data cards are stored in the data card set associated with the first entity by passing a data card set and the copy data card set to a classifier, the classifier being arranged to determine the likelihood that data cards are stored in the data card collection associated with the first entity; and, determining that the probability exceeds a threshold value, declare that data cards are associated with the first entity in the data card collection.
[2]
The method of claim 1, wherein the classifier is an arbitrary forest classifier.
[3]
The method of claim 1 or claim 2, further comprising training the classifier using a plurality of training examples, wherein training examples include: one or more pairs of data card sets, each first pair representing a common entity; and one or more second pairs of data sets wherein each second pair represents unrelated entities.
[4]
The method of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the classifier evaluates properties of each data card, including at least one of a word overlap count, word frequency, a word-based or character-based cosine similarity, trade category codes, and numeric city codes associated with each data card.
[5]
The method of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the classifier evaluates properties of each data card including at least one of a fractional difference in size of an average card size in the data card, a standard deviation between the average card sizes in the data cards, and a fractional difference in an order size of card size variations.
[6]
The method of any one of the preceding claims, wherein converting the data card collection to the copy data card collection comprises: combining the data cards from the data card collection into the copy data card collection.
[7]
The method of any one of the preceding claims, further comprising performing an analysis on a set of the data cards, the set comprising the data cards of the copy data card set and the data cards traced as being associated with the first entity.
[8]
The method of claim 10, further comprising determining, for each transaction data card set, aggregated values for the attributes of the transaction data card set; and determining aggregated values for attributes of the instance data set.
[9]
A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the data cards are financial transaction data cards, for example comprising credit or debit transactions processed by a financial institution for a trader.
[10]
The method of claim 9, wherein attributes of the financial transaction data cards comprise one or more of the following: an identification of the merchant from which the financial transaction originates; an identification of the owner of the credit or debit account; an amount of the financial transaction; a date of the financial transaction; a time of the financial transaction; and a location from where the financial transaction originates.
[11]
A computer program comprising machine readable instructions that, when executed by a computer device, causes it to perform the method of any one of the preceding claims.
[12]
A computer system comprising: a memory; and a processing unit in which one or more programs are stored arranged to perform an operation for identifying related transaction data cards from a database in which data cards are stored for multiple entities, the method comprising: retrieving a plurality of data card collection gen, wherein each data card set comprises one or more of the data cards that share a common attribute value; receiving a selection from or selecting an instance data set, the instance data set comprising a plurality of data cards associated with a first entity; for each of the plurality of data card sets: determining a probability with which data cards associated with the first entity are stored on the data card set by passing a data card set and the copy data card set to a classifier, the classifier being arranged to determine the probability sets with which the data card set stores data cards associated with the first entity, and when determining that the probability exceeds a threshold value, declare the data card set as data cards storing associated with the first entity.
[13]
The system of claim 12, wherein the classifier is an arbitrary forest classifier.
[14]
The system of claim 12 or claim 13, further comprising training the classifier using a plurality of training examples, the training examples comprising: one or more first pairs of data card sets, each first pair representing a common entity; and one or more second pairs of data card sets, each second pair representing unrelated entities.
[15]
The system of any one of claims 12 to 14, wherein the tracing of the data card set to the copy data card set comprises: merging the data cards from the data card set into the copy data card set.
[16]
The system of any one of claims 12 to 15, further comprising performing an analysis on a set of the data cards, the set comprising the data cards of the copy data card set and the data cards declared as associated with the first entity.
[17]
The system of any one of claims 12 to 16, wherein determining probability comprises passing a transaction data card set and the copy data card set to a classifier, the classifier being arranged to determine the probability with which the transaction data card set Transaction data cards are stored that are associated with the first entity.
[18]
The system of any one of claims 12 to 17, further comprising determining, for each transaction data card set, aggregated values for the attributes of the transaction data card set; and determining aggregated values for attributes of the instance data set.
[19]
The system of any one of claims 12 to 18, wherein the transactional data cards are financial transactional data cards, for example comprising credit or debit transactions processed by a financial institution for a trader.
[20]
The system of claim 19, wherein attributes of the financial transaction data cards comprise one or more of the following: an identification of the merchant from which the financial transaction originates; an identification of the owner of the credit or debit account; an amount of the financial transaction; a date of the financial transaction; a time of the financial transaction; a location from which the financial transaction originates.

类似技术:

---

公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题

---

NL2012438B1|2016-07-05|Resolving similar entities from a database.

---

US11227001B2|2022-01-18|Massive scale heterogeneous data ingestion and user resolution

---

WO2019214245A1|2019-11-14|Information pushing method and apparatus, and terminal device and storage medium

---

JP5372956B2|2013-12-18|Method and system for implementing approximate string matching in a database

---

US9317613B2|2016-04-19|Large scale entity-specific resource classification

---

US8666976B2|2014-03-04|Methods and systems for implementing approximate string matching within a database

---

US8738486B2|2014-05-27|Methods and apparatus for implementing an ensemble merchant prediction system

---

JP6744854B2|2020-08-19|Data storage method, data inquiry method, and device thereof

---

TW201421395A|2014-06-01|System and method for recursively traversing the internet and other sources to identify, gather, curate, adjudicate, and qualify business identity and related data

---

US20220075762A1|2022-03-10|Method for classifying an unmanaged dataset

---

US10789225B2|2020-09-29|Column weight calculation for data deduplication

---

CN112818215A|2021-05-18|Product data processing method, device, equipment and storage medium

---

US10509809B1|2019-12-17|Constructing ground truth when classifying data

---

US11048984B2|2021-06-29|Systems and techniques to monitor text data quality

---

JP2020201819A|2020-12-17|Business matching support device and business matching support method

---

TWI700664B|2020-08-01|Text processing method and system

---

US20210026872A1|2021-01-28|Data classification

---

Verma2018|A Comparative Study of Oversampling Techniques on Binary Classification for Detecting Duplicate Advertisement

---

CN110737749A|2020-01-31|Entrepreneurship plan evaluation method, entrepreneurship plan evaluation device, computer equipment and storage medium

---

CN110941952A|2020-03-31|Method and device for perfecting audit analysis model

---

AU2015249134A1|2015-11-19|Fuzzy data operations

---

WO2014004478A1|2014-01-03|Methods and systems for implementing approximate string matching within a database

同族专利:

---

公开号 | 公开日

---

NL2012438B1|2016-07-05|

---

US20140279299A1|2014-09-18|

---

CA2845743A1|2014-09-14|

---

US10140664B2|2018-11-27|

---

GB2513472A|2014-10-29|

---

AU2014201516A1|2014-10-02|

---

CA2845743C|2020-03-31|

---

GB201404499D0|2014-04-30|

---

DE102014204827A1|2014-09-18|

引用文献:

---

公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题

---

US20120215784A1|2007-03-20|2012-08-23|Gary King|System for estimating a distribution of message content categories in source data|

---

US20120022945A1|2010-07-22|2012-01-26|Visa International Service Association|Systems and Methods to Identify Payment Accounts Having Business Spending Activities|

---

US5241625A|1990-11-27|1993-08-31|Farallon Computing, Inc.|Screen image sharing among heterogeneous computers|

---

US6101479A|1992-07-15|2000-08-08|Shaw; James G.|System and method for allocating company resources to fulfill customer expectations|

---

US5819226A|1992-09-08|1998-10-06|Hnc Software Inc.|Fraud detection using predictive modeling|

---

US5777549A|1995-03-29|1998-07-07|Cabletron Systems, Inc.|Method and apparatus for policy-based alarm notification in a distributed network management environment|

---

US6094643A|1996-06-14|2000-07-25|Card Alert Services, Inc.|System for detecting counterfeit financial card fraud|

---

US5878434A|1996-07-18|1999-03-02|Novell, Inc|Transaction clash management in a disconnectable computer and network|

---

US5832218A|1995-12-14|1998-11-03|International Business Machines Corporation|Client/server electronic mail system for providng off-line client utilization and seamless server resynchronization|

---

US6006242A|1996-04-05|1999-12-21|Bankers Systems, Inc.|Apparatus and method for dynamically creating a document|

---

US5845300A|1996-06-05|1998-12-01|Microsoft Corporation|Method and apparatus for suggesting completions for a partially entered data item based on previously-entered, associated data items|

---

US5897636A|1996-07-11|1999-04-27|Tandem Corporation Incorporated|Distributed object computer system with hierarchical name space versioning|

---

US5892900A|1996-08-30|1999-04-06|Intertrust Technologies Corp.|Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection|

---

US5826021A|1996-09-17|1998-10-20|Sun Microsystems, Inc.|Disconnected write authorization in a client/server computing system|

---

US5870559A|1996-10-15|1999-02-09|Mercury Interactive|Software system and associated methods for facilitating the analysis and management of web sites|

---

CA2190043C|1996-11-12|2001-10-16|Don E. Hameluck|Buffered screen capturing software tool usability testing of computer applications|

---

US6430305B1|1996-12-20|2002-08-06|Synaptics, Incorporated|Identity verification methods|

---

US6065026A|1997-01-09|2000-05-16|Document.Com, Inc.|Multi-user electronic document authoring system with prompted updating of shared language|

---

US9053222B2|2002-05-17|2015-06-09|Lawrence A. Lynn|Patient safety processor|

---

US5966706A|1997-02-19|1999-10-12|At&T Corp|Local logging in a distributed database management computer system|

---

US6026233A|1997-05-27|2000-02-15|Microsoft Corporation|Method and apparatus for presenting and selecting options to modify a programming language statement|

---

US7403922B1|1997-07-28|2008-07-22|Cybersource Corporation|Method and apparatus for evaluating fraud risk in an electronic commerce transaction|

---

US6463404B1|1997-08-08|2002-10-08|British Telecommunications Public Limited Company|Translation|

---

US6134582A|1998-05-26|2000-10-17|Microsoft Corporation|System and method for managing electronic mail messages using a client-based database|

---

US7168039B2|1998-06-02|2007-01-23|International Business Machines Corporation|Method and system for reducing the horizontal space required for displaying a column containing text data|

---

US6243706B1|1998-07-24|2001-06-05|Avid Technology, Inc.|System and method for managing the creation and production of computer generated works|

---

US6243717B1|1998-09-01|2001-06-05|Camstar Systems, Inc.|System and method for implementing revision management of linked data entities and user dependent terminology|

---

US6232971B1|1998-09-23|2001-05-15|International Business Machines Corporation|Variable modality child windows|

---

US7213030B1|1998-10-16|2007-05-01|Jenkins Steven R|Web-enabled transaction and collaborative management system|

---

US6560578B2|1999-03-12|2003-05-06|Expanse Networks, Inc.|Advertisement selection system supporting discretionary target market characteristics|

---

US7418399B2|1999-03-10|2008-08-26|Illinois Institute Of Technology|Methods and kits for managing diagnosis and therapeutics of bacterial infections|

---

US7373592B2|1999-07-30|2008-05-13|Microsoft Corporation|Modeless child windows for application programs|

---

JP2003519828A|1999-09-21|2003-06-24|チョイスメーカーテクノロジーズインコーポレイテッド|Probabilistic record link model derived from training data|

---

US6523019B1|1999-09-21|2003-02-18|Choicemaker Technologies, Inc.|Probabilistic record linkage model derived from training data|

---

US6519627B1|1999-09-27|2003-02-11|International Business Machines Corporation|System and method for conducting disconnected transactions with service contracts for pervasive computing devices|

---

AU7729300A|1999-10-01|2001-05-10|Global Graphics Software Limited|Method and system for arranging a workflow using graphical user interface|

---

US8091784B1|2005-03-09|2012-01-10|Diebold, Incorporated|Banking system controlled responsive to data bearing records|

---

US6944821B1|1999-12-07|2005-09-13|International Business Machines Corporation|Copy/paste mechanism and paste buffer that includes source information for copied data|

---

US20040117387A1|2000-02-25|2004-06-17|Vincent Civetta|Database sizing and diagnostic utility|

---

US20020032677A1|2000-03-01|2002-03-14|Jeff Morgenthaler|Methods for creating, editing, and updating searchable graphical database and databases of graphical images and information and displaying graphical images from a searchable graphical database or databases in a sequential or slide show format|

---

JP2001283120A|2000-03-31|2001-10-12|Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd|Transaction supporting system|

---

IE20010467A1|2000-05-16|2001-11-28|Garrett O'carroll|A document processing system and method|

---

US8386945B1|2000-05-17|2013-02-26|Eastman Kodak Company|System and method for implementing compound documents in a production printing workflow|

---

GB2366498A|2000-08-25|2002-03-06|Copyn Ltd|Method of bookmarking a section of a web-page and storing said bookmarks|

---

US6795868B1|2000-08-31|2004-09-21|Data Junction Corp.|System and method for event-driven data transformation|

---

TWI244617B|2000-09-16|2005-12-01|Ibm|A client/server-based data processing system for performing transactions between clients and a server and a method of performing the transactions|

---

US20020065708A1|2000-09-22|2002-05-30|Hikmet Senay|Method and system for interactive visual analyses of organizational interactions|

---

US8707185B2|2000-10-10|2014-04-22|Addnclick, Inc.|Dynamic information management system and method for content delivery and sharing in content-, metadata- and viewer-based, live social networking among users concurrently engaged in the same and/or similar content|

---

US6754640B2|2000-10-30|2004-06-22|William O. Bozeman|Universal positive pay match, authentication, authorization, settlement and clearing system|

---

US6978419B1|2000-11-15|2005-12-20|Justsystem Corporation|Method and apparatus for efficient identification of duplicate and near-duplicate documents and text spans using high-discriminability text fragments|

---

US7058648B1|2000-12-01|2006-06-06|Oracle International Corporation|Hierarchy-based secured document repository|

---

US20020103705A1|2000-12-06|2002-08-01|Forecourt Communication Group|Method and apparatus for using prior purchases to select activities to present to a customer|

---

US7529698B2|2001-01-16|2009-05-05|Raymond Anthony Joao|Apparatus and method for providing transaction history information, account history information, and/or charge-back information|

---

US7921123B2|2001-02-20|2011-04-05|Hartford Fire Insurance Company|Method and system for processing physician claims over a network|

---

US20100057622A1|2001-02-27|2010-03-04|Faith Patrick L|Distributed Quantum Encrypted Pattern Generation And Scoring|

---

US6980984B1|2001-05-16|2005-12-27|Kanisa, Inc.|Content provider systems and methods using structured data|

---

US7877421B2|2001-05-25|2011-01-25|International Business Machines Corporation|Method and system for mapping enterprise data assets to a semantic information model|

---

US20040205492A1|2001-07-26|2004-10-14|Newsome Mark R.|Content clipping service|

---

US20030036927A1|2001-08-20|2003-02-20|Bowen Susan W.|Healthcare information search system and user interface|

---

US20030061132A1|2001-09-26|2003-03-27|Yu, Mason K.|System and method for categorizing, aggregating and analyzing payment transactions data|

---

US7058567B2|2001-10-10|2006-06-06|Xerox Corporation|Natural language parser|

---

US6877136B2|2001-10-26|2005-04-05|United Services Automobile Association |System and method of providing electronic access to one or more documents|

---

US7756728B2|2001-10-31|2010-07-13|Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc.|Healthcare system and user interface for consolidating patient related information from different sources|

---

US20120065987A1|2010-09-09|2012-03-15|Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc.|Computer-Based Patient Management for Healthcare|

---

US6876996B2|2001-11-14|2005-04-05|Sun Microsystems, Inc.|Method and apparatus for using a shared library mechanism to facilitate sharing of metadata|

---

US7089541B2|2001-11-30|2006-08-08|Sun Microsystems, Inc.|Modular parser architecture with mini parsers|

---

US7475242B2|2001-12-18|2009-01-06|Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.|Controlling the distribution of information|

---

US7174377B2|2002-01-16|2007-02-06|Xerox Corporation|Method and apparatus for collaborative document versioning of networked documents|

---

US7225183B2|2002-01-28|2007-05-29|Ipxl, Inc.|Ontology-based information management system and method|

---

US7813937B1|2002-02-15|2010-10-12|Fair Isaac Corporation|Consistency modeling of healthcare claims to detect fraud and abuse|

---

US20030171942A1|2002-03-06|2003-09-11|I-Centrix Llc|Contact relationship management system and method|

---

US6993539B2|2002-03-19|2006-01-31|Network Appliance, Inc.|System and method for determining changes in two snapshots and for transmitting changes to destination snapshot|

---

AU2002323166A1|2002-03-20|2003-10-08|Catalina Marketing International Inc.|Targeted incentives based upon predicted behavior|

---

US7533026B2|2002-04-12|2009-05-12|International Business Machines Corporation|Facilitating management of service elements usable in providing information technology service offerings|

---

US7426559B2|2002-05-09|2008-09-16|International Business Machines Corporation|Method for sequential coordination of external database application events with asynchronous internal database events|

---

US7539680B2|2002-05-10|2009-05-26|Lsi Corporation|Revision control for database of evolved design|

---

US8232725B1|2002-05-21|2012-07-31|Imaging Systems Technology|Plasma-tube gas discharge device|

---

AU2003278612A1|2002-06-24|2004-01-23|Xymphonic Systems As|Method for data-centric collaboration|

---

US6996583B2|2002-07-01|2006-02-07|International Business Machines Corporation|Real-time database update transaction with disconnected relational database clients|

---

US20040006523A1|2002-07-08|2004-01-08|Coker Don W.|System and method for preventing financial fraud|

---

US7461158B2|2002-08-07|2008-12-02|Intelliden, Inc.|System and method for controlling access rights to network resources|

---

US7076508B2|2002-08-12|2006-07-11|International Business Machines Corporation|Method, system, and program for merging log entries from multiple recovery log files|

---

US8799023B2|2002-10-18|2014-08-05|Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc.|Mass customization for management of healthcare|

---

GB0224589D0|2002-10-22|2002-12-04|British Telecomm|Method and system for processing or searching user records|

---

US20040083466A1|2002-10-29|2004-04-29|Dapp Michael C.|Hardware parser accelerator|

---

US20040088177A1|2002-11-04|2004-05-06|Electronic Data Systems Corporation|Employee performance management method and system|

---

US7900052B2|2002-11-06|2011-03-01|International Business Machines Corporation|Confidential data sharing and anonymous entity resolution|

---

WO2004046957A2|2002-11-15|2004-06-03|Creo Inc.|Methods and systems for sharing data|

---

US20040111480A1|2002-12-09|2004-06-10|Yue Jonathan Zhanjun|Message screening system and method|

---

US8589273B2|2002-12-23|2013-11-19|Ge Corporate Financial Services, Inc.|Methods and systems for managing risk management information|

---

US7752117B2|2003-01-31|2010-07-06|Trading Technologies International, Inc.|System and method for money management in electronic trading environment|

---

US7912842B1|2003-02-04|2011-03-22|Lexisnexis Risk Data Management Inc.|Method and system for processing and linking data records|

---

US7403942B1|2003-02-04|2008-07-22|Seisint, Inc.|Method and system for processing data records|

---

US20040153418A1|2003-02-05|2004-08-05|Hanweck Gerald Alfred|System and method for providing access to data from proprietary tools|

---

US8386377B1|2003-05-12|2013-02-26|Id Analytics, Inc.|System and method for credit scoring using an identity network connectivity|

---

US7809650B2|2003-07-01|2010-10-05|Visa U.S.A. Inc.|Method and system for providing risk information in connection with transaction processing|

---

US8412566B2|2003-07-08|2013-04-02|Yt Acquisition Corporation|High-precision customer-based targeting by individual usage statistics|

---

AU2003903994A0|2003-07-31|2003-08-14|Canon Kabushiki Kaisha|Collaborative editing with automatic layout|

---

US20090132347A1|2003-08-12|2009-05-21|Russell Wayne Anderson|Systems And Methods For Aggregating And Utilizing Retail Transaction Records At The Customer Level|

---

US20060143075A1|2003-09-22|2006-06-29|Ryan Carr|Assumed demographics, predicted behaviour, and targeted incentives|

---

US7584172B2|2003-10-16|2009-09-01|Sap Ag|Control for selecting data query and visual configuration|

---

US20050091186A1|2003-10-24|2005-04-28|Alon Elish|Integrated method and apparatus for capture, storage, and retrieval of information|

---

US8627489B2|2003-10-31|2014-01-07|Adobe Systems Incorporated|Distributed document version control|

---

US7080104B2|2003-11-07|2006-07-18|Plaxo, Inc.|Synchronization and merge engines|

---

US20050131935A1|2003-11-18|2005-06-16|O'leary Paul J.|Sector content mining system using a modular knowledge base|

---

US20050125715A1|2003-12-04|2005-06-09|Fabrizio Di Franco|Method of saving data in a graphical user interface|

---

US6948656B2|2003-12-23|2005-09-27|First Data Corporation|System with GPS to manage risk of financial transactions|

---

US7917376B2|2003-12-29|2011-03-29|Montefiore Medical Center|System and method for monitoring patient care|

---

US8725493B2|2004-01-06|2014-05-13|Neuric Llc|Natural language parsing method to provide conceptual flow|

---

US20050154769A1|2004-01-13|2005-07-14|Llumen, Inc.|Systems and methods for benchmarking business performance data against aggregated business performance data|

---

US20050154628A1|2004-01-13|2005-07-14|Illumen, Inc.|Automated management of business performance information|

---

US7853533B2|2004-03-02|2010-12-14|The 41St Parameter, Inc.|Method and system for identifying users and detecting fraud by use of the internet|

---

US20060026120A1|2004-03-24|2006-02-02|Update Publications Lp|Method and system for collecting, processing, and distributing residential property data|

---

US20060031779A1|2004-04-15|2006-02-09|Citrix Systems, Inc.|Selectively sharing screen data|

---

US8041701B2|2004-05-04|2011-10-18|DG FastChannel, Inc|Enhanced graphical interfaces for displaying visual data|

---

US7689601B2|2004-05-06|2010-03-30|Oracle International Corporation|Achieving web documents using unique document locators|

---

US7587721B2|2004-05-20|2009-09-08|Sap Ag|Sharing objects in runtime systems|

---

US7415704B2|2004-05-20|2008-08-19|Sap Ag|Sharing objects in runtime systems|

---

GB2414576A|2004-05-25|2005-11-30|Arion Human Capital Ltd|Business communication monitoring system detecting anomalous communication patterns|

---

WO2005116851A2|2004-05-25|2005-12-08|Postini, Inc.|Electronic message source information reputation system|

---

US8161122B2|2005-06-03|2012-04-17|Messagemind, Inc.|System and method of dynamically prioritized electronic mail graphical user interface, and measuring email productivity and collaboration trends|

---

US8924469B2|2008-06-05|2014-12-30|Headwater Partners I Llc|Enterprise access control and accounting allocation for access networks|

---

US20060010130A1|2004-07-09|2006-01-12|Avraham Leff|Method and apparatus for synchronizing client transactions executed by an autonomous client|

---

US7870487B2|2004-07-29|2011-01-11|International Business Machines Corporation|Inserting into a document a screen image of a computer software application|

---

US7552116B2|2004-08-06|2009-06-23|The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois|Method and system for extracting web query interfaces|

---

WO2006018843A2|2004-08-16|2006-02-23|Beinsync Ltd.|A system and method for the synchronization of data across multiple computing devices|

---

US7617232B2|2004-09-02|2009-11-10|Microsoft Corporation|Centralized terminology and glossary development|

---

US7493333B2|2004-09-03|2009-02-17|Biowisdom Limited|System and method for parsing and/or exporting data from one or more multi-relational ontologies|

---

US20060059423A1|2004-09-13|2006-03-16|Stefan Lehmann|Apparatus, system, and method for creating customized workflow documentation|

---

US20060080316A1|2004-10-08|2006-04-13|Meridio Ltd|Multiple indexing of an electronic document to selectively permit access to the content and metadata thereof|

---

US20060080139A1|2004-10-08|2006-04-13|Woodhaven Health Services|Preadmission health care cost and reimbursement estimation tool|

---

US8892571B2|2004-10-12|2014-11-18|International Business Machines Corporation|Systems for associating records in healthcare database with individuals|

---

US7739246B2|2004-10-14|2010-06-15|Microsoft Corporation|System and method of merging contacts|

---

US7757220B2|2004-10-21|2010-07-13|Discovery Machine, Inc.|Computer interchange of knowledge hierarchies|

---

US7797197B2|2004-11-12|2010-09-14|Amazon Technologies, Inc.|Method and system for analyzing the performance of affiliate sites|

---

US8938434B2|2004-11-22|2015-01-20|Intelius, Inc.|Household grouping based on public records|

---

US7899796B1|2004-11-23|2011-03-01|Andrew Borthwick|Batch automated blocking and record matching|

---

US20060178954A1|2004-12-13|2006-08-10|Rohit Thukral|Iterative asset reconciliation process|

---

US20060129746A1|2004-12-14|2006-06-15|Ithink, Inc.|Method and graphic interface for storing, moving, sending or printing electronic data to two or more locations, in two or more formats with a single save function|

---

US7451397B2|2004-12-15|2008-11-11|Microsoft Corporation|System and method for automatically completing spreadsheet formulas|

---

US9020887B2|2004-12-21|2015-04-28|Proofpoint, Inc.|Managing the status of documents in a distributed storage system|

---

US20060143079A1|2004-12-29|2006-06-29|Jayanta Basak|Cross-channel customer matching|

---

US8700414B2|2004-12-29|2014-04-15|Sap Ag|System supported optimization of event resolution|

---

US8271436B2|2005-02-07|2012-09-18|Mimosa Systems, Inc.|Retro-fitting synthetic full copies of data|

---

US20060190295A1|2005-02-22|2006-08-24|Richard Merkin|Systems and methods for assessing and optimizing healthcare administration|

---

WO2006102270A2|2005-03-22|2006-09-28|Cooper Kim A|Performance motivation systems and methods for contact centers|

---

US20060218491A1|2005-03-25|2006-09-28|International Business Machines Corporation|System, method and program product for community review of documents|

---

US7596528B1|2005-03-31|2009-09-29|Trading Technologies International, Inc.|System and method for dynamically regulating order entry in an electronic trading environment|

---

US8145686B2|2005-05-06|2012-03-27|Microsoft Corporation|Maintenance of link level consistency between database and file system|

---

US7672968B2|2005-05-12|2010-03-02|Apple Inc.|Displaying a tooltip associated with a concurrently displayed database object|

---

US20060277460A1|2005-06-03|2006-12-07|Scott Forstall|Webview applications|

---

US8341259B2|2005-06-06|2012-12-25|Adobe Systems Incorporated|ASP for web analytics including a real-time segmentation workbench|

---

EP1732034A1|2005-06-06|2006-12-13|First Data Corporation|System and method for authorizing electronic payment transactions|

---

WO2007002702A2|2005-06-24|2007-01-04|Fair Isaac Corporation|Mass compromise / point of compromise analytic detection and compromised card portfolio management system|

---

WO2007004224A1|2005-07-05|2007-01-11|Mconfirm Ltd.|Improved location based authentication system|

---

US8645175B1|2005-07-12|2014-02-04|Open Text S.A.|Workflow system and method for single call batch processing of collections of database records|

---

US7991764B2|2005-07-22|2011-08-02|Yogesh Chunilal Rathod|Method and system for communication, publishing, searching, sharing and dynamically providing a journal feed|

---

US7421429B2|2005-08-04|2008-09-02|Microsoft Corporation|Generate blog context ranking using track-back weight, context weight and, cumulative comment weight|

---

US20090168163A1|2005-11-01|2009-07-02|Global Bionic Optics Pty Ltd.|Optical lens systems|

---

US7529726B2|2005-08-22|2009-05-05|International Business Machines Corporation|XML sub-document versioning method in XML databases using record storages|

---

US8095866B2|2005-09-09|2012-01-10|Microsoft Corporation|Filtering user interface for a data summary table|

---

US7958147B1|2005-09-13|2011-06-07|James Luke Turner|Method for providing customized and automated security assistance, a document marking regime, and central tracking and control for sensitive or classified documents in electronic format|

---

US7941336B1|2005-09-14|2011-05-10|D2C Solutions, LLC|Segregation-of-duties analysis apparatus and method|

---

US8468441B2|2005-09-15|2013-06-18|Microsoft Corporation|Cross-application support of charts|

---

US7672833B2|2005-09-22|2010-03-02|Fair Isaac Corporation|Method and apparatus for automatic entity disambiguation|

---

US8306986B2|2005-09-30|2012-11-06|American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.|Method, system, and computer program product for linking customer information|

---

US7668769B2|2005-10-04|2010-02-23|Basepoint Analytics, LLC|System and method of detecting fraud|

---

US20070178501A1|2005-12-06|2007-08-02|Matthew Rabinowitz|System and method for integrating and validating genotypic, phenotypic and medical information into a database according to a standardized ontology|

---

EP2463354B1|2005-12-08|2017-03-29|National Institute for Materials Science|Phosphor, Process for producing the same, and luminescent device|

---

US20070136095A1|2005-12-09|2007-06-14|Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of The University Of Arizona|Icon Queues for Workflow Management|

---

US7606844B2|2005-12-19|2009-10-20|Commvault Systems, Inc.|System and method for performing replication copy storage operations|

---

US8726144B2|2005-12-23|2014-05-13|Xerox Corporation|Interactive learning-based document annotation|

---

US7788296B2|2005-12-29|2010-08-31|Guidewire Software, Inc.|Method and apparatus for managing a computer-based address book for incident-related work|

---

US8712828B2|2005-12-30|2014-04-29|Accenture Global Services Limited|Churn prediction and management system|

---

US20070185867A1|2006-02-03|2007-08-09|Matteo Maga|Statistical modeling methods for determining customer distribution by churn probability within a customer population|

---

US7490298B2|2006-04-12|2009-02-10|International Business Machines Corporation|Creating documentation screenshots on demand|

---

US7756843B1|2006-05-25|2010-07-13|Juniper Networks, Inc.|Identifying and processing confidential information on network endpoints|

---

US11122009B2|2009-12-01|2021-09-14|Apple Inc.|Systems and methods for identifying geographic locations of social media content collected over social networks|

---

US9195985B2|2006-06-08|2015-11-24|Iii Holdings 1, Llc|Method, system, and computer program product for customer-level data verification|

---

US7866542B2|2006-06-08|2011-01-11|International Business Machines Corporation|System and method for resolving identities that are indefinitely resolvable|

---

JP4218700B2|2006-06-19|2009-02-04|コニカミノルタビジネステクノロジーズ株式会社|Image forming apparatus|

---

US7720789B2|2006-06-23|2010-05-18|International Business Machines Corporation|System and method of member unique names|

---

US7933955B2|2006-07-11|2011-04-26|Igor Khalatian|One-click universal screen sharing|

---

US20120173381A1|2011-01-03|2012-07-05|Stanley Benjamin Smith|Process and system for pricing and processing weighted data in a federated or subscription based data source|

---

US7747562B2|2006-08-15|2010-06-29|International Business Machines Corporation|Virtual multidimensional datasets for enterprise software systems|

---

US8230332B2|2006-08-30|2012-07-24|Compsci Resources, Llc|Interactive user interface for converting unstructured documents|

---

US8054756B2|2006-09-18|2011-11-08|Yahoo! Inc.|Path discovery and analytics for network data|

---

US9183321B2|2006-10-16|2015-11-10|Oracle International Corporation|Managing compound XML documents in a repository|

---

US20080103798A1|2006-10-25|2008-05-01|Domenikos Steven D|Identity Protection|

---

US7792353B2|2006-10-31|2010-09-07|Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.|Retraining a machine-learning classifier using re-labeled training samples|

---

US8229902B2|2006-11-01|2012-07-24|Ab Initio Technology Llc|Managing storage of individually accessible data units|

---

US8117281B2|2006-11-02|2012-02-14|Addnclick, Inc.|Using internet content as a means to establish live social networks by linking internet users to each other who are simultaneously engaged in the same and/or similar content|

---

US20080109714A1|2006-11-03|2008-05-08|Sap Ag|Capturing screen information|

---

US7657497B2|2006-11-07|2010-02-02|Ebay Inc.|Online fraud prevention using genetic algorithm solution|

---

US7962495B2|2006-11-20|2011-06-14|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Creating data in a data store using a dynamic ontology|

---

US7853614B2|2006-11-27|2010-12-14|Rapleaf, Inc.|Hierarchical, traceable, and association reputation assessment of email domains|

---

US8117022B2|2006-12-07|2012-02-14|Linker Sheldon O|Method and system for machine understanding, knowledge, and conversation|

---

US8126848B2|2006-12-07|2012-02-28|Robert Edward Wagner|Automated method for identifying and repairing logical data discrepancies between database replicas in a database cluster|

---

US8290838B1|2006-12-29|2012-10-16|Amazon Technologies, Inc.|Indicating irregularities in online financial transactions|

---

WO2008092147A2|2007-01-26|2008-07-31|Information Resources, Inc.|Analytic platform|

---

US8171418B2|2007-01-31|2012-05-01|Salesforce.Com, Inc.|Method and system for presenting a visual representation of the portion of the sets of data that a query is expected to return|

---

US20080208735A1|2007-02-22|2008-08-28|American Expresstravel Related Services Company, Inc., A New York Corporation|Method, System, and Computer Program Product for Managing Business Customer Contacts|

---

US7873557B2|2007-02-28|2011-01-18|Aaron Guidotti|Information, document, and compliance management for financial professionals, clients, and supervisors|

---

US8036971B2|2007-03-30|2011-10-11|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Generating dynamic date sets that represent market conditions|

---

US20080255973A1|2007-04-10|2008-10-16|Robert El Wade|Sales transaction analysis tool and associated method of use|

---

US20090164387A1|2007-04-17|2009-06-25|Semandex Networks Inc.|Systems and methods for providing semantically enhanced financial information|

---

US7880921B2|2007-05-01|2011-02-01|Michael Joseph Dattilo|Method and apparatus to digitally whiteout mistakes on a printed form|

---

US7962904B2|2007-05-10|2011-06-14|Microsoft Corporation|Dynamic parser|

---

US7840456B2|2007-05-30|2010-11-23|Intuit Inc.|System and method for categorizing credit card transaction data|

---

US7930547B2|2007-06-15|2011-04-19|Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc.|High accuracy bloom filter using partitioned hashing|

---

WO2009009623A1|2007-07-09|2009-01-15|Tailwalker Technologies, Inc.|Integrating a methodology management system with project tasks in a project management system|

---

US7966199B1|2007-07-19|2011-06-21|Intuit Inc.|Method and system for identification of geographic condition zones using aggregated claim data|

---

US8600872B1|2007-07-27|2013-12-03|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.|System and method for detecting account compromises|

---

US8156166B2|2007-08-06|2012-04-10|Intuit Inc.|Method and apparatus for selecting a doctor based on an observed experience level|

---

US20130275186A1|2007-08-14|2013-10-17|Visa U.S.A. Inc.|Merchant Benchmarking Tool|

---

US7761525B2|2007-08-23|2010-07-20|International Business Machines Corporation|System and method for providing improved time references in documents|

---

US8631015B2|2007-09-06|2014-01-14|Linkedin Corporation|Detecting associates|

---

WO2009039391A1|2007-09-21|2009-03-26|The Methodist Hospital System|Systems, methods and apparatuses for generating and using representations of individual or aggregate human medical data|

---

EP2051173A3|2007-09-27|2009-08-12|Magix Ag|System and method for dynamic content insertion from the internet into a multimedia work|

---

US8849728B2|2007-10-01|2014-09-30|Purdue Research Foundation|Visual analytics law enforcement tools|

---

US8484115B2|2007-10-03|2013-07-09|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Object-oriented time series generator|

---

US20090094270A1|2007-10-08|2009-04-09|Alirez Baldomero J|Method of building a validation database|

---

US8554719B2|2007-10-18|2013-10-08|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Resolving database entity information|

---

US8214308B2|2007-10-23|2012-07-03|Sas Institute Inc.|Computer-implemented systems and methods for updating predictive models|

---

US7650310B2|2007-10-30|2010-01-19|Intuit Inc.|Technique for reducing phishing|

---

US20090126020A1|2007-11-09|2009-05-14|Norton Richard Elliott|Engine for rule based content filtering|

---

US9898767B2|2007-11-14|2018-02-20|Panjiva, Inc.|Transaction facilitating marketplace platform|

---

US8423425B2|2007-11-14|2013-04-16|Panjiva, Inc.|Evaluating public records of supply transactions for financial investment decisions|

---

US20090150868A1|2007-12-10|2009-06-11|Al Chakra|Method and System for Capturing Movie Shots at the Time of an Automated Graphical User Interface Test Failure|

---

US8270577B2|2007-12-13|2012-09-18|Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc.|Multiple visual voicemail mailboxes|

---

US8417715B1|2007-12-19|2013-04-09|Tilmann Bruckhaus|Platform independent plug-in methods and systems for data mining and analytics|

---

US8666976B2|2007-12-31|2014-03-04|Mastercard International Incorporated|Methods and systems for implementing approximate string matching within a database|

---

US8738486B2|2007-12-31|2014-05-27|Mastercard International Incorporated|Methods and apparatus for implementing an ensemble merchant prediction system|

---

US7925652B2|2007-12-31|2011-04-12|Mastercard International Incorporated|Methods and systems for implementing approximate string matching within a database|

---

US8055633B2|2008-01-21|2011-11-08|International Business Machines Corporation|Method, system and computer program product for duplicate detection|

---

KR100915295B1|2008-01-22|2009-09-03|성균관대학교산학협력단|System and method for search service having a function of automatic classification of search results|

---

US20090199106A1|2008-02-05|2009-08-06|Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab|Communication terminal including graphical bookmark manager|

---

US20090216562A1|2008-02-22|2009-08-27|Faulkner Judith R|Method and apparatus for accommodating diverse healthcare record centers|

---

US8473519B1|2008-02-25|2013-06-25|Cisco Technology, Inc.|Unified communication audit tool|

---

US7765489B1|2008-03-03|2010-07-27|Shah Shalin N|Presenting notifications related to a medical study on a toolbar|

---

US8191766B2|2008-03-04|2012-06-05|Mastercard International Incorporated|Methods and systems for managing merchant identifiers|

---

US8856088B2|2008-04-01|2014-10-07|Microsoft Corporation|Application-managed file versioning|

---

US8121962B2|2008-04-25|2012-02-21|Fair Isaac Corporation|Automated entity identification for efficient profiling in an event probability prediction system|

---

US20090282068A1|2008-05-12|2009-11-12|Shockro John J|Semantic packager|

---

WO2009149063A1|2008-06-02|2009-12-10|Azuki Systems, Inc.|Media mashup system|

---

US20090319515A1|2008-06-02|2009-12-24|Steven Minton|System and method for managing entity knowledgebases|

---

US20090307049A1|2008-06-05|2009-12-10|Fair Isaac Corporation|Soft Co-Clustering of Data|

---

US8301593B2|2008-06-12|2012-10-30|Gravic, Inc.|Mixed mode synchronous and asynchronous replication system|

---

US8860754B2|2008-06-22|2014-10-14|Tableau Software, Inc.|Methods and systems of automatically generating marks in a graphical view|

---

JP2011530138A|2008-08-04|2011-12-15|クイッドインコーポレイテッド|Business performance analysis engine|

---

US9383911B2|2008-09-15|2016-07-05|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Modal-less interface enhancements|

---

US8417561B2|2008-09-24|2013-04-09|Bank Of America Corporation|Market dynamics|

---

CN101685449B|2008-09-26|2012-07-11|国际商业机器公司|Method and system for connecting tables in a plurality of heterogeneous distributed databases|

---

US20100114887A1|2008-10-17|2010-05-06|Google Inc.|Textual Disambiguation Using Social Connections|

---

US8391584B2|2008-10-20|2013-03-05|Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.|Method and system for duplicate check detection|

---

US8306947B2|2008-10-30|2012-11-06|Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.|Replication of operations on objects distributed in a storage system|

---

US7974943B2|2008-10-30|2011-07-05|Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.|Building a synchronized target database|

---

US20100131502A1|2008-11-25|2010-05-27|Fordham Bradley S|Cohort group generation and automatic updating|

---

US8204859B2|2008-12-10|2012-06-19|Commvault Systems, Inc.|Systems and methods for managing replicated database data|

---

US8719350B2|2008-12-23|2014-05-06|International Business Machines Corporation|Email addressee verification|

---

US10115153B2|2008-12-31|2018-10-30|Fair Isaac Corporation|Detection of compromise of merchants, ATMS, and networks|

---

US20100262688A1|2009-01-21|2010-10-14|Daniar Hussain|Systems, methods, and devices for detecting security vulnerabilities in ip networks|

---

US20100191563A1|2009-01-23|2010-07-29|Doctors' Administrative Solutions, Llc|Physician Practice Optimization Tracking|

---

US20110213655A1|2009-01-24|2011-09-01|Kontera Technologies, Inc.|Hybrid contextual advertising and related content analysis and display techniques|

---

US8073857B2|2009-02-17|2011-12-06|International Business Machines Corporation|Semantics-based data transformation over a wire in mashups|

---

US8473454B2|2009-03-10|2013-06-25|Xerox Corporation|System and method of on-demand document processing|

---

US20100235915A1|2009-03-12|2010-09-16|Nasir Memon|Using host symptoms, host roles, and/or host reputation for detection of host infection|

---

US20100306285A1|2009-05-28|2010-12-02|Arcsight, Inc.|Specifying a Parser Using a Properties File|

---

US9141911B2|2009-05-29|2015-09-22|Aspen Technology, Inc.|Apparatus and method for automated data selection in model identification and adaptation in multivariable process control|

---

US20100306029A1|2009-06-01|2010-12-02|Ryan Jolley|Cardholder Clusters|

---

US8495151B2|2009-06-05|2013-07-23|Chandra Bodapati|Methods and systems for determining email addresses|

---

US20100313239A1|2009-06-09|2010-12-09|International Business Machines Corporation|Automated access control for rendered output|

---

US8554742B2|2009-07-06|2013-10-08|Intelligent Medical Objects, Inc.|System and process for record duplication analysis|

---

WO2011015222A1|2009-07-15|2011-02-10|Proviciel - Mlstate|System and method for creating a parser generator and associated computer program|

---

US8392556B2|2009-07-16|2013-03-05|Ca, Inc.|Selective reporting of upstream transaction trace data|

---

US9104695B1|2009-07-27|2015-08-11|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Geotagging structured data|

---

US10242540B2|2009-09-02|2019-03-26|Fair Isaac Corporation|Visualization for payment card transaction fraud analysis|

---

US9280777B2|2009-09-08|2016-03-08|Target Brands, Inc.|Operations dashboard|

---

US20110066497A1|2009-09-14|2011-03-17|Choicestream, Inc.|Personalized advertising and recommendation|

---

US8214490B1|2009-09-15|2012-07-03|Symantec Corporation|Compact input compensating reputation data tracking mechanism|

---

US20110078173A1|2009-09-30|2011-03-31|Avaya Inc.|Social Network User Interface|

---

EP2483640B1|2009-09-30|2018-05-09|Videojet Technologies, Inc.|Thermal ink jet ink composition|

---

US8595058B2|2009-10-15|2013-11-26|Visa U.S.A.|Systems and methods to match identifiers|

---

US8321360B2|2009-10-22|2012-11-27|Symantec Corporation|Method and system for weighting transactions in a fraud detection system|

---

US9165304B2|2009-10-23|2015-10-20|Service Management Group, Inc.|Analyzing consumer behavior using electronically-captured consumer location data|

---

US20110112995A1|2009-10-28|2011-05-12|Industrial Technology Research Institute|Systems and methods for organizing collective social intelligence information using an organic object data model|

---

CN102054015B|2009-10-28|2014-05-07|财团法人工业技术研究院|System and method of organizing community intelligent information by using organic matter data model|

---

US8504456B2|2009-12-01|2013-08-06|Bank Of America Corporation|Behavioral baseline scoring and risk scoring|

---

US8645478B2|2009-12-10|2014-02-04|Mcafee, Inc.|System and method for monitoring social engineering in a computer network environment|

---

US20110153384A1|2009-12-17|2011-06-23|Matthew Donald Horne|Visual comps builder|

---

US9026552B2|2010-01-18|2015-05-05|Salesforce.Com, Inc.|System and method for linking contact records to company locations|

---

US20110208822A1|2010-02-22|2011-08-25|Yogesh Chunilal Rathod|Method and system for customized, contextual, dynamic and unified communication, zero click advertisement and prospective customers search engine|

---

US20110208565A1|2010-02-23|2011-08-25|Michael Ross| complex process management|

---

US8478709B2|2010-03-08|2013-07-02|Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.|Evaluation of client status for likelihood of churn|

---

US8752054B2|2010-03-11|2014-06-10|Avaya Inc.|Intelligent merging of transactions based on a variety of criteria|

---

US20110225482A1|2010-03-15|2011-09-15|Wizpatent Pte Ltd|Managing and generating citations in scholarly work|

---

US20110231296A1|2010-03-16|2011-09-22|UberMedia, Inc.|Systems and methods for interacting with messages, authors, and followers|

---

US20110231305A1|2010-03-19|2011-09-22|Visa U.S.A. Inc.|Systems and Methods to Identify Spending Patterns|

---

US8739118B2|2010-04-08|2014-05-27|Microsoft Corporation|Pragmatic mapping specification, compilation and validation|

---

US8306846B2|2010-04-12|2012-11-06|First Data Corporation|Transaction location analytics systems and methods|

---

US20110258216A1|2010-04-20|2011-10-20|International Business Machines Corporation|Usability enhancements for bookmarks of browsers|

---

US8255399B2|2010-04-28|2012-08-28|Microsoft Corporation|Data classifier|

---

US8874432B2|2010-04-28|2014-10-28|Nec Laboratories America, Inc.|Systems and methods for semi-supervised relationship extraction|

---

US8473415B2|2010-05-04|2013-06-25|Kevin Paul Siegel|System and method for identifying a point of compromise in a payment transaction processing system|

---

US20110289397A1|2010-05-19|2011-11-24|Mauricio Eastmond|Displaying Table Data in a Limited Display Area|

---

US20110295649A1|2010-05-31|2011-12-01|International Business Machines Corporation|Automatic churn prediction|

---

US8756224B2|2010-06-16|2014-06-17|Rallyverse, Inc.|Methods, systems, and media for content ranking using real-time data|

---

US8380719B2|2010-06-18|2013-02-19|Microsoft Corporation|Semantic content searching|

---

US8364642B1|2010-07-07|2013-01-29|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Managing disconnected investigations|

---

US8407341B2|2010-07-09|2013-03-26|Bank Of America Corporation|Monitoring communications|

---

US8775530B2|2010-08-25|2014-07-08|International Business Machines Corporation|Communication management method and system|

---

US20120066166A1|2010-09-10|2012-03-15|International Business Machines Corporation|Predictive Analytics for Semi-Structured Case Oriented Processes|

---

US20120078595A1|2010-09-24|2012-03-29|Nokia Corporation|Method and apparatus for ontology matching|

---

US8549004B2|2010-09-30|2013-10-01|Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.|Estimation of unique database values|

---

US8498998B2|2010-10-11|2013-07-30|International Business Machines Corporation|Grouping identity records to generate candidate lists to use in an entity and relationship resolution process|

---

US8666861B2|2010-10-21|2014-03-04|Visa International Service Association|Software and methods for risk and fraud mitigation|

---

WO2012061162A1|2010-10-25|2012-05-10|Intelius Inc.|Cost-sensitive alternating decision trees for record linkage|

---

JP5706137B2|2010-11-22|2015-04-22|インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーションＩｎｔｅｒｎａｔｉｏｎａｌ Ｂｕｓｉｎｅｓｓ Ｍａｃｈｉｎｅｓ Ｃｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ|Method and computer program for displaying a plurality of posts on a computer screen in real time along a plurality of axes|

---

EP2643759B1|2010-11-24|2019-10-16|Logrhythm, Inc.|Advanced intelligence engine|

---

CN102546446A|2010-12-13|2012-07-04|太仓市浏河镇亿网行网络技术服务部|Email device|

---

US9141405B2|2010-12-15|2015-09-22|International Business Machines Corporation|User interface construction|

---

US8719166B2|2010-12-16|2014-05-06|Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc.|Iterative processing of transaction information to detect fraud|

---

US20120197660A1|2011-01-31|2012-08-02|Ez Derm, Llc|Systems and methods to faciliate medical services|

---

US20120197657A1|2011-01-31|2012-08-02|Ez Derm, Llc|Systems and methods to facilitate medical services|

---

IL211163D0|2011-02-10|2011-04-28|Univ Ben Gurion|A method for generating a randomized data structure for representing sets, based on bloom filters|

---

WO2012116287A1|2011-02-24|2012-08-30|Lexisnexis, A Division Of Reed Elsevier Inc.|Methods for electronic document searching and graphically representing electronic document searches|

---

CA2828751C|2011-03-01|2019-04-02|Early Warning Services, Llc|System and method for suspect entity detection and mitigation|

---

AU2012230299B2|2011-03-23|2016-04-14|Detica Patent Limited|An automated fraud detection method and system|

---

US20120278249A1|2011-04-29|2012-11-01|American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.|Generating an Identity Theft Score|

---

US8861861B2|2011-05-10|2014-10-14|Expensify, Inc.|System and method for processing receipts and other records of users|

---

US9104765B2|2011-06-17|2015-08-11|Robert Osann, Jr.|Automatic webpage characterization and search results annotation|

---

US8533165B2|2011-07-03|2013-09-10|Microsoft Corporation|Conflict resolution via metadata examination|

---

US8726379B1|2011-07-15|2014-05-13|Norse Corporation|Systems and methods for dynamic protection from electronic attacks|

---

US8982130B2|2011-07-15|2015-03-17|Green Charge Networks|Cluster mapping to highlight areas of electrical congestion|

---

US9996807B2|2011-08-17|2018-06-12|Roundhouse One Llc|Multidimensional digital platform for building integration and analysis|

---

US8732574B2|2011-08-25|2014-05-20|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|System and method for parameterizing documents for automatic workflow generation|

---

US8630892B2|2011-08-31|2014-01-14|Accenture Global Services Limited|Churn analysis system|

---

US8949164B1|2011-09-08|2015-02-03|George O. Mohler|Event forecasting system|

---

US20130226318A1|2011-09-22|2013-08-29|Dariusz Procyk|Process transformation and transitioning apparatuses, methods and systems|

---

BR112014008351A2|2011-10-05|2017-04-18|Mastercard International Inc|naming mechanism|

---

US8849776B2|2011-10-17|2014-09-30|Yahoo! Inc.|Method and system for resolving data inconsistency|

---

US8626545B2|2011-10-17|2014-01-07|CrowdFlower, Inc.|Predicting future performance of multiple workers on crowdsourcing tasks and selecting repeated crowdsourcing workers|

---

US8843421B2|2011-11-01|2014-09-23|Accenture Global Services Limited|Identification of entities likely to engage in a behavior|

---

US20130124193A1|2011-11-15|2013-05-16|Business Objects Software Limited|System and Method Implementing a Text Analysis Service|

---

US9159024B2|2011-12-07|2015-10-13|Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.|Real-time predictive intelligence platform|

---

CN103167093A|2011-12-08|2013-06-19|青岛海信移动通信技术股份有限公司|Filling method of mobile phone email address|

---

US9026480B2|2011-12-21|2015-05-05|Telenav, Inc.|Navigation system with point of interest classification mechanism and method of operation thereof|

---

US8880420B2|2011-12-27|2014-11-04|Grubhub, Inc.|Utility for creating heatmaps for the study of competitive advantage in the restaurant marketplace|

---

US8843431B2|2012-01-16|2014-09-23|International Business Machines Corporation|Social network analysis for churn prediction|

---

US8909648B2|2012-01-18|2014-12-09|Technion Research & Development Foundation Limited|Methods and systems of supervised learning of semantic relatedness|

---

US9279898B2|2012-02-09|2016-03-08|Pgs Geophysical As|Methods and systems for correction of streamer-depth bias in marine seismic surveys|

---

US20130226944A1|2012-02-24|2013-08-29|Microsoft Corporation|Format independent data transformation|

---

GB2508573A|2012-02-28|2014-06-11|Qatar Foundation|A computer-implemented method and computer program for detecting a set of inconsistent data records in a database including multiple records|

---

US8620963B2|2012-03-08|2013-12-31|eBizprise Inc.|Large-scale data processing system, method, and non-transitory tangible machine-readable medium thereof|

---

JP2013191187A|2012-03-15|2013-09-26|Fujitsu Ltd|Processing device, program and processing system|

---

US20130263019A1|2012-03-30|2013-10-03|Maria G. Castellanos|Analyzing social media|

---

US20130262328A1|2012-03-30|2013-10-03|CSRSI, Inc.|System and method for automated data breach compliance|

---

US9298856B2|2012-04-23|2016-03-29|Sap Se|Interactive data exploration and visualization tool|

---

US8798354B1|2012-04-25|2014-08-05|Intuit Inc.|Method and system for automatic correlation of check-based payments to customer accounts and/or invoices|

---

US9043710B2|2012-04-26|2015-05-26|Sap Se|Switch control in report generation|

---

US10304036B2|2012-05-07|2019-05-28|Nasdaq, Inc.|Social media profiling for one or more authors using one or more social media platforms|

---

EP2662782A1|2012-05-10|2013-11-13|Siemens Aktiengesellschaft|Method and system for storing data in a database|

---

US8788471B2|2012-05-30|2014-07-22|International Business Machines Corporation|Matching transactions in multi-level records|

---

US9032531B1|2012-06-28|2015-05-12|Middlegate, Inc.|Identification breach detection|

---

US10163158B2|2012-08-27|2018-12-25|Yuh-Shen Song|Transactional monitoring system|

---

US20140068487A1|2012-09-05|2014-03-06|Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc.|Computer Implemented Methods For Visualizing Correlations Between Blood Glucose Data And Events And Apparatuses Thereof|

---

AU2013323618B2|2012-09-25|2019-04-04|Mx Technologies Inc.|Aggregation source routing|

---

US20140095509A1|2012-10-02|2014-04-03|Banjo, Inc.|Method of tagging content lacking geotags with a location|

---

DE112013004915T8|2012-10-08|2015-07-23|Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.|Configurable user displays in a process control system|

---

US9104786B2|2012-10-12|2015-08-11|International Business Machines Corporation|Iterative refinement of cohorts using visual exploration and data analytics|

---

US8688573B1|2012-10-16|2014-04-01|Intuit Inc.|Method and system for identifying a merchant payee associated with a cash transaction|

---

US8914886B2|2012-10-29|2014-12-16|Mcafee, Inc.|Dynamic quarantining for malware detection|

---

US9501761B2|2012-11-05|2016-11-22|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|System and method for sharing investigation results|

---

US10504127B2|2012-11-15|2019-12-10|Home Depot Product Authority, Llc|System and method for classifying relevant competitors|

---

US20140143009A1|2012-11-16|2014-05-22|International Business Machines Corporation|Risk reward estimation for company-country pairs|

---

US20140156527A1|2012-11-30|2014-06-05|Bank Of America Corporation|Pre-payment authorization categorization|

---

US20140157172A1|2012-11-30|2014-06-05|Drillmap|Geographic layout of petroleum drilling data and methods for processing data|

---

US10672008B2|2012-12-06|2020-06-02|Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.|System and method for data analytics|

---

US9497289B2|2012-12-07|2016-11-15|Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc.|System and method for social message classification based on influence|

---

US9294576B2|2013-01-02|2016-03-22|Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc|Social media impact assessment|

---

US20140195515A1|2013-01-10|2014-07-10|I3 Analytics|Methods and systems for querying and displaying data using interactive three-dimensional representations|

---

US8639552B1|2013-01-24|2014-01-28|Broadvision, Inc.|Systems and methods for creating and sharing tasks|

---

US9892026B2|2013-02-01|2018-02-13|Ab Initio Technology Llc|Data records selection|

---

US20140222793A1|2013-02-07|2014-08-07|Parlance Corporation|System and Method for Automatically Importing, Refreshing, Maintaining, and Merging Contact Sets|

---

US20140222521A1|2013-02-07|2014-08-07|Ibms, Llc|Intelligent management and compliance verification in distributed work flow environments|

---

US9264393B2|2013-02-13|2016-02-16|International Business Machines Corporation|Mail server-based dynamic workflow management|

---

US8744890B1|2013-02-14|2014-06-03|Aktana, Inc.|System and method for managing system-level workflow strategy and individual workflow activity|

---

US20140244284A1|2013-02-25|2014-08-28|Complete Consent, Llc|Communication of medical claims|

---

US9286618B2|2013-03-08|2016-03-15|Mastercard International Incorporated|Recognizing and combining redundant merchant designations in a transaction database|

---

US10140664B2|2013-03-14|2018-11-27|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Resolving similar entities from a transaction database|

---

GB2513720A|2013-03-15|2014-11-05|Palantir Technologies Inc|Computer-implemented systems and methods for comparing and associating objects|

---

GB2513721A|2013-03-15|2014-11-05|Palantir Technologies Inc|Computer-implemented systems and methods for comparing and associating objects|

---

US8855999B1|2013-03-15|2014-10-07|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Method and system for generating a parser and parsing complex data|

---

US8903717B2|2013-03-15|2014-12-02|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Method and system for generating a parser and parsing complex data|

---

US8924388B2|2013-03-15|2014-12-30|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Computer-implemented systems and methods for comparing and associating objects|

---

US9372929B2|2013-03-20|2016-06-21|Securboration, Inc.|Methods and systems for node and link identification|

---

US20140358789A1|2013-05-30|2014-12-04|B. Scott Boding|Acquirer facing fraud management system and method|

---

US9576248B2|2013-06-01|2017-02-21|Adam M. Hurwitz|Record linkage sharing using labeled comparison vectors and a machine learning domain classification trainer|

---

GB2517582A|2013-07-05|2015-02-25|Palantir Technologies Inc|Data quality monitors|

---

US8601326B1|2013-07-05|2013-12-03|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Data quality monitors|

---

US8838538B1|2013-07-31|2014-09-16|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Techniques for replicating changes to access control lists on investigative analysis data|

---

US9378030B2|2013-10-01|2016-06-28|Aetherpal, Inc.|Method and apparatus for interactive mobile device guidance|

---

US8938686B1|2013-10-03|2015-01-20|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for analyzing performance of an entity|

---

US8812960B1|2013-10-07|2014-08-19|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Cohort-based presentation of user interaction data|

---

US8832594B1|2013-11-04|2014-09-09|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Space-optimized display of multi-column tables with selective text truncation based on a combined text width|

---

US9356937B2|2013-11-13|2016-05-31|International Business Machines Corporation|Disambiguating conflicting content filter rules|

---

US10586234B2|2013-11-13|2020-03-10|Mastercard International Incorporated|System and method for detecting fraudulent network events|

---

US9105000B1|2013-12-10|2015-08-11|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Aggregating data from a plurality of data sources|

---

US20150161611A1|2013-12-10|2015-06-11|Sas Institute Inc.|Systems and Methods for Self-Similarity Measure|

---

US10356032B2|2013-12-26|2019-07-16|Palantir Technologies Inc.|System and method for detecting confidential information emails|

---

US8832832B1|2014-01-03|2014-09-09|Palantir Technologies Inc.|IP reputation|

---

US9129219B1|2014-06-30|2015-09-08|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Crime risk forecasting|

---

US9256664B2|2014-07-03|2016-02-09|Palantir Technologies Inc.|System and method for news events detection and visualization|

---

US9483546B2|2014-12-15|2016-11-01|Palantir Technologies Inc.|System and method for associating related records to common entities across multiple lists|US8554719B2|2007-10-18|2013-10-08|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Resolving database entity information|

---

US9383911B2|2008-09-15|2016-07-05|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Modal-less interface enhancements|

---

US9104695B1|2009-07-27|2015-08-11|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Geotagging structured data|

---

US8688749B1|2011-03-31|2014-04-01|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Cross-ontology multi-master replication|

---

US9547693B1|2011-06-23|2017-01-17|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Periodic database search manager for multiple data sources|

---

US8732574B2|2011-08-25|2014-05-20|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|System and method for parameterizing documents for automatic workflow generation|

---

US8782004B2|2012-01-23|2014-07-15|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Cross-ACL multi-master replication|

---

US9798768B2|2012-09-10|2017-10-24|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Search around visual queries|

---

US9348677B2|2012-10-22|2016-05-24|Palantir Technologies Inc.|System and method for batch evaluation programs|

---

US9501507B1|2012-12-27|2016-11-22|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Geo-temporal indexing and searching|

---

US10140664B2|2013-03-14|2018-11-27|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Resolving similar entities from a transaction database|

---

US8924388B2|2013-03-15|2014-12-30|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Computer-implemented systems and methods for comparing and associating objects|

---

US8903717B2|2013-03-15|2014-12-02|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Method and system for generating a parser and parsing complex data|

---

US10275778B1|2013-03-15|2019-04-30|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and user interfaces for dynamic and interactive investigation based on automatic malfeasance clustering of related data in various data structures|

---

US8868486B2|2013-03-15|2014-10-21|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Time-sensitive cube|

---

US8909656B2|2013-03-15|2014-12-09|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Filter chains with associated multipath views for exploring large data sets|

---

US8799799B1|2013-05-07|2014-08-05|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Interactive geospatial map|

---

US8886601B1|2013-06-20|2014-11-11|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|System and method for incrementally replicating investigative analysis data|

---

US8601326B1|2013-07-05|2013-12-03|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Data quality monitors|

---

US9830325B1|2013-09-11|2017-11-28|Intuit Inc.|Determining a likelihood that two entities are the same|

---

US9785317B2|2013-09-24|2017-10-10|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Presentation and analysis of user interaction data|

---

US8938686B1|2013-10-03|2015-01-20|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for analyzing performance of an entity|

---

US8812960B1|2013-10-07|2014-08-19|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Cohort-based presentation of user interaction data|

---

US9116975B2|2013-10-18|2015-08-25|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and user interfaces for dynamic and interactive simultaneous querying of multiple data stores|

---

US9105000B1|2013-12-10|2015-08-11|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Aggregating data from a plurality of data sources|

---

US9734217B2|2013-12-16|2017-08-15|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Methods and systems for analyzing entity performance|

---

US10579647B1|2013-12-16|2020-03-03|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Methods and systems for analyzing entity performance|

---

US10356032B2|2013-12-26|2019-07-16|Palantir Technologies Inc.|System and method for detecting confidential information emails|

---

US8832832B1|2014-01-03|2014-09-09|Palantir Technologies Inc.|IP reputation|

---

IN2014MU00169A|2014-01-17|2015-08-28|Tata Consultancy Services Ltd|

---

US8924429B1|2014-03-18|2014-12-30|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Determining and extracting changed data from a data source|

---

US9836580B2|2014-03-21|2017-12-05|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Provider portal|

---

US11263646B1|2014-03-31|2022-03-01|Groupon, Inc.|Systems, apparatus, and methods of programmatically determining unique contacts|

---

US9904959B2|2014-06-09|2018-02-27|Verifi, Inc.|Descriptor exchange|

---

US9535974B1|2014-06-30|2017-01-03|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for identifying key phrase clusters within documents|

---

US9619557B2|2014-06-30|2017-04-11|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Systems and methods for key phrase characterization of documents|

---

US9129219B1|2014-06-30|2015-09-08|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Crime risk forecasting|

---

US9256664B2|2014-07-03|2016-02-09|Palantir Technologies Inc.|System and method for news events detection and visualization|

---

US10572935B1|2014-07-16|2020-02-25|Intuit, Inc.|Disambiguation of entities based on financial interactions|

---

US9390086B2|2014-09-11|2016-07-12|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Classification system with methodology for efficient verification|

---

US9767172B2|2014-10-03|2017-09-19|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Data aggregation and analysis system|

---

US9501851B2|2014-10-03|2016-11-22|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Time-series analysis system|

---

US9785328B2|2014-10-06|2017-10-10|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Presentation of multivariate data on a graphical user interface of a computing system|

---

US9229952B1|2014-11-05|2016-01-05|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|History preserving data pipeline system and method|

---

US9043894B1|2014-11-06|2015-05-26|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Malicious software detection in a computing system|

---

US10108623B2|2014-12-12|2018-10-23|International Business Machines Corporation|Merging database operations for serializable transaction execution|

---

US9483546B2|2014-12-15|2016-11-01|Palantir Technologies Inc.|System and method for associating related records to common entities across multiple lists|

---

US10362133B1|2014-12-22|2019-07-23|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Communication data processing architecture|

---

US10552994B2|2014-12-22|2020-02-04|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and interactive user interfaces for dynamic retrieval, analysis, and triage of data items|

---

US9348920B1|2014-12-22|2016-05-24|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Concept indexing among database of documents using machine learning techniques|

---

US10452651B1|2014-12-23|2019-10-22|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Searching charts|

---

US9817563B1|2014-12-29|2017-11-14|Palantir Technologies Inc.|System and method of generating data points from one or more data stores of data items for chart creation and manipulation|

---

US9335911B1|2014-12-29|2016-05-10|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Interactive user interface for dynamic data analysis exploration and query processing|

---

US9727560B2|2015-02-25|2017-08-08|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for organizing and identifying documents via hierarchies and dimensions of tags|

---

EP3070622A1|2015-03-16|2016-09-21|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Interactive user interfaces for location-based data analysis|

---

US9886467B2|2015-03-19|2018-02-06|Plantir Technologies Inc.|System and method for comparing and visualizing data entities and data entity series|

---

US9348880B1|2015-04-01|2016-05-24|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Federated search of multiple sources with conflict resolution|

---

US10103953B1|2015-05-12|2018-10-16|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Methods and systems for analyzing entity performance|

---

US10146853B2|2015-05-15|2018-12-04|International Business Machines Corporation|Determining entity relationship when entities contain other entities|

---

US10628834B1|2015-06-16|2020-04-21|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Fraud lead detection system for efficiently processing database-stored data and automatically generating natural language explanatory information of system results for display in interactive user interfaces|

---

US10387882B2|2015-07-01|2019-08-20|Klarna Ab|Method for using supervised model with physical store|

---

US9904916B2|2015-07-01|2018-02-27|Klarna Ab|Incremental login and authentication to user portal without username/password|

---

US9418337B1|2015-07-21|2016-08-16|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and models for data analytics|

---

US9392008B1|2015-07-23|2016-07-12|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for identifying information related to payment card breaches|

---

US9996595B2|2015-08-03|2018-06-12|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Providing full data provenance visualization for versioned datasets|

---

US9456000B1|2015-08-06|2016-09-27|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems, methods, user interfaces, and computer-readable media for investigating potential malicious communications|

---

US9600146B2|2015-08-17|2017-03-21|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Interactive geospatial map|

---

US10127289B2|2015-08-19|2018-11-13|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for automatic clustering and canonical designation of related data in various data structures|

---

US9671776B1|2015-08-20|2017-06-06|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Quantifying, tracking, and anticipating risk at a manufacturing facility, taking deviation type and staffing conditions into account|

---

US11150917B2|2015-08-26|2021-10-19|Palantir Technologies Inc.|System for data aggregation and analysis of data from a plurality of data sources|

---

US9485265B1|2015-08-28|2016-11-01|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Malicious activity detection system capable of efficiently processing data accessed from databases and generating alerts for display in interactive user interfaces|

---

US10496716B2|2015-08-31|2019-12-03|Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc|Discovery of network based data sources for ingestion and recommendations|

---

US10706434B1|2015-09-01|2020-07-07|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Methods and systems for determining location information|

---

US9984428B2|2015-09-04|2018-05-29|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for structuring data from unstructured electronic data files|

---

US9639580B1|2015-09-04|2017-05-02|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Computer-implemented systems and methods for data management and visualization|

---

US20170069002A1|2015-09-09|2017-03-09|Mastercard International Incorporated|Systems and Methods for Identifying Aggregate Merchants|

---

US9576015B1|2015-09-09|2017-02-21|Palantir Technologies, Inc.|Domain-specific language for dataset transformations|

---

US9424669B1|2015-10-21|2016-08-23|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Generating graphical representations of event participation flow|

---

US10235725B2|2015-11-09|2019-03-19|Mastercard International Incorporated|Method and system for determining merchant gratuity values|

---

US10706056B1|2015-12-02|2020-07-07|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Audit log report generator|

---

US9514414B1|2015-12-11|2016-12-06|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for identifying and categorizing electronic documents through machine learning|

---

US9760556B1|2015-12-11|2017-09-12|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for annotating and linking electronic documents|

---

US10114884B1|2015-12-16|2018-10-30|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for attribute analysis of one or more databases|

---

US20170178247A1|2015-12-17|2017-06-22|SpringAhead, Inc.|Dynamic data normalization and duplicate analysis|

---

US10373099B1|2015-12-18|2019-08-06|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Misalignment detection system for efficiently processing database-stored data and automatically generating misalignment information for display in interactive user interfaces|

---

US10871878B1|2015-12-29|2020-12-22|Palantir Technologies Inc.|System log analysis and object user interaction correlation system|

---

US9792020B1|2015-12-30|2017-10-17|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems for collecting, aggregating, and storing data, generating interactive user interfaces for analyzing data, and generating alerts based upon collected data|

---

US10698938B2|2016-03-18|2020-06-30|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for organizing and identifying documents via hierarchies and dimensions of tags|

---

US9652139B1|2016-04-06|2017-05-16|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Graphical representation of an output|

---

US10068199B1|2016-05-13|2018-09-04|Palantir Technologies Inc.|System to catalogue tracking data|

---

US10007674B2|2016-06-13|2018-06-26|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Data revision control in large-scale data analytic systems|

---

US10545975B1|2016-06-22|2020-01-28|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Visual analysis of data using sequenced dataset reduction|

---

US10909130B1|2016-07-01|2021-02-02|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Graphical user interface for a database system|

---

US11106692B1|2016-08-04|2021-08-31|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Data record resolution and correlation system|

---

US10552002B1|2016-09-27|2020-02-04|Palantir Technologies Inc.|User interface based variable machine modeling|

---

US10133588B1|2016-10-20|2018-11-20|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Transforming instructions for collaborative updates|

---

US10726507B1|2016-11-11|2020-07-28|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Graphical representation of a complex task|

---

US10318630B1|2016-11-21|2019-06-11|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Analysis of large bodies of textual data|

---

US9842338B1|2016-11-21|2017-12-12|Palantir Technologies Inc.|System to identify vulnerable card readers|

---

US11250425B1|2016-11-30|2022-02-15|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Generating a statistic using electronic transaction data|

---

US9886525B1|2016-12-16|2018-02-06|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Data item aggregate probability analysis system|

---

GB201621434D0|2016-12-16|2017-02-01|Palantir Technologies Inc|Processing sensor logs|

---

US10249033B1|2016-12-20|2019-04-02|Palantir Technologies Inc.|User interface for managing defects|

---

US10728262B1|2016-12-21|2020-07-28|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Context-aware network-based malicious activity warning systems|

---

US10360238B1|2016-12-22|2019-07-23|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Database systems and user interfaces for interactive data association, analysis, and presentation|

---

US10721262B2|2016-12-28|2020-07-21|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Resource-centric network cyber attack warning system|

---

US10762471B1|2017-01-09|2020-09-01|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Automating management of integrated workflows based on disparate subsidiary data sources|

---

US10133621B1|2017-01-18|2018-11-20|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Data analysis system to facilitate investigative process|

---

US10509844B1|2017-01-19|2019-12-17|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Network graph parser|

---

US10515109B2|2017-02-15|2019-12-24|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Real-time auditing of industrial equipment condition|

---

US10581954B2|2017-03-29|2020-03-03|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Metric collection and aggregation for distributed software services|

---

US10866936B1|2017-03-29|2020-12-15|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Model object management and storage system|

---

US10133783B2|2017-04-11|2018-11-20|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for constraint driven database searching|

---

US11074277B1|2017-05-01|2021-07-27|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Secure resolution of canonical entities|

---

US10606872B1|2017-05-22|2020-03-31|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Graphical user interface for a database system|

---

US10795749B1|2017-05-31|2020-10-06|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for providing fault analysis user interface|

---

US10956406B2|2017-06-12|2021-03-23|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Propagated deletion of database records and derived data|

---

US11216762B1|2017-07-13|2022-01-04|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Automated risk visualization using customer-centric data analysis|

---

US10572835B2|2017-07-13|2020-02-25|Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc|Machine-learning algorithm for talent peer determinations|

---

US10430444B1|2017-07-24|2019-10-01|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Interactive geospatial map and geospatial visualization systems|

---

US10235533B1|2017-12-01|2019-03-19|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Multi-user access controls in electronic simultaneously editable document editor|

---

US10769171B1|2017-12-07|2020-09-08|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Relationship analysis and mapping for interrelated multi-layered datasets|

---

US10783162B1|2017-12-07|2020-09-22|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Workflow assistant|

---

US10877984B1|2017-12-07|2020-12-29|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for filtering and visualizing large scale datasets|

---

US10541881B2|2017-12-14|2020-01-21|Disney Enterprises, Inc.|Automated network supervision including detecting an anonymously administered node, identifying the administrator of the anonymously administered node, and registering the administrator and the anonymously administered node|

---

US11061874B1|2017-12-14|2021-07-13|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for resolving entity data across various data structures|

---

US10838987B1|2017-12-20|2020-11-17|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Adaptive and transparent entity screening|

---

US11263382B1|2017-12-22|2022-03-01|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Data normalization and irregularity detection system|

---

US20190272482A1|2018-03-05|2019-09-05|Deepak Chandrakant Patil|Online sampling analysis|

---

US10877654B1|2018-04-03|2020-12-29|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Graphical user interfaces for optimizations|

---

US10754822B1|2018-04-18|2020-08-25|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for ontology migration|

---

US10885021B1|2018-05-02|2021-01-05|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Interactive interpreter and graphical user interface|

---

US10754946B1|2018-05-08|2020-08-25|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for implementing a machine learning approach to modeling entity behavior|

---

US11061542B1|2018-06-01|2021-07-13|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Systems and methods for determining and displaying optimal associations of data items|

---

US10795909B1|2018-06-14|2020-10-06|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Minimized and collapsed resource dependency path|

---

US11119630B1|2018-06-19|2021-09-14|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Artificial intelligence assisted evaluations and user interface for same|

---

US11164245B1|2018-08-28|2021-11-02|Intuit Inc.|Method and system for identifying characteristics of transaction strings with an attention based recurrent neural network|

---

US11126638B1|2018-09-13|2021-09-21|Palantir Technologies Inc.|Data visualization and parsing system|

---

US20200098053A1|2018-09-26|2020-03-26|Intuit Inc.|Method and system for user data driven financial transaction description dictionary construction|

---

US10891631B2|2018-12-10|2021-01-12|Paypal, Inc.|Framework for generating risk evaluation models|

---

CN109829804A|2019-01-10|2019-05-31|西安交通大学|A kind of tax risk recognition methods towards marker samples missing administrative region|

---

EP3923154A1|2020-06-11|2021-12-15|Ivalua Sas|Identifying and generating links between data|

法律状态:
2021-11-03| MM| Lapsed because of non-payment of the annual fee|Effective date: 20210401 |

优先权:

---

申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题

---

US201313827491|2013-03-14|

---

US13/827,491|US10140664B2|2013-03-14|2013-03-14|Resolving similar entities from a transaction database|

---